The applicants alleged, inter alia , that during this period they had been victims of forced labour and human trafficking, had worked without contracts and work permits, had their documents taken away

The decision noted that the police officers, who were accused by the applicant, were not present in the police station on the day of the alleged incident.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 9.

It was alleged that the plot had been designed to put an end to Mr Kholodov’s publications about corruption in the Russian Army.

The complaint also alleged the crimes of abuse of office and general endangerment punishable under the domestic criminal law.

and the Central Election Commission (“the CEC”) concerning various alleged irregularities in the election process in his constituency.

    In the present case the alleged ongoing violations ceased in May 2022 when the applicants returned to Sweden. 10.

The applicant alleged that while there, he had been hit and threatened. 4.     On the same day, the applicant filed a complaint.

discrimination in that respect on account of their ethnic origin, as well as (iv) alleged lack of an effective remedy.

The applicants alleged that the criminal proceedings against them were unfair and breached their rights guaranteed by Article   6 of the Convention.

  77190/11 on account of the alleged shooting at the applicants and the alleged absence of an effective investigation in this regard (see Georgia v.

There were no recreational activities, she was not allowed to continue her education and since the summer of 2020, in view of the COVID-19 pandemic, she was not allowed any in-person visits, her right

Accordingly, the victims of the alleged Convention violations in the present case fell within the respondent State’s jurisdiction. The respondent Government’s objection was dismissed.

He was prosecuted for smuggling and alleged that the length of the proceedings was unreasonable, contrary to Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) of the European Convention

The authorities’ failure to react to such coherent and persistent submissions had undermined the prospects of the alleged hate crime offence being properly investigated.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 3 IN CONJUNCTION WITH ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 39.

Serbia lodged on 16 May 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant complains about the length of his pre-trial detention, the reasoning offered by the domestic courts therefor, and the said courts’ alleged

The applicant alleged that the doctors’ medical negligence caused her new-born a severe physical and mental disability. After a long suffering the child passed away on 28 June 2016.

The applicant submitted that the officials ought to have been aware his status as an unaccompanied minor and ought to have allowed him to apply for asylum.