CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

27 275 résultats pour « Wayl »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-180529

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2017

19 décembre 2017

According to him, a one-way journey to the court lasts 1.5 hours on average.

Source officielle

Page 88 sur 1364

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC82 résultats

Journal officiel
Dépôts des comptes

Wayland

SIREN 931056378Greffe du Tribunal des Activités Economiques de paris

09/07/2026

Voir →

Radiations

WAYLAM

SIREN 985093681Greffe du Tribunal des Activités Economiques de Marseille

02/06/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

WAYLOG

SIREN 508303955Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de montpellier

15/05/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

WAYLKHOME

SIREN 948357512Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce d'annecy

11/05/2026

Voir →

Modifications diverses

WAYLEE

SIREN 937599520Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Troyes

05/03/2026

Voir →

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0618JUD005047408

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2013

18 juin 2013

#xa0; On 22 October 1991 the applicant and his neighbours filed an action in trespass against MÁV, seeking that it be obliged to keep its noise emission under control by constructing a noise barrier wall

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1130DEC001818011

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2023

30 novembre 2023

K.’s colleague A. stated that they had been working together on that day and that K. had fallen from a chair and had hit his head against the wall.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0707DEC003959004

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2009

7 juillet 2009

When the applicant’s family returned in 1945, they found only the bare walls. All equipment had been stolen.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159938

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2015

15 décembre 2015

It said that it had no way of knowing whether the comments complained of were true or not, or subject to some other defence in law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1108DEC001993317

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2022

8 novembre 2022

News reports suggest that the damage consisted mostly of damaged roof tiles and chimneys and of cracked walls. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114JUD000865610

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2014

14 janvier 2014

They started driving away and the two officers, I.H.Y. and H.B., gave chase until Murat   Kasap and R.S. crashed into a wall. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0504DEC003805907

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2010

4 mai 2010

Furthermore, the article was a long way from balanced coverage that also indicated doubts as to the truth of the statements made by Mr   D.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0910JUD004631108

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2020

10 septembre 2020

was adjacent to their balcony and the continuation of such a wall had been constructed directly against their balcony.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0312DEC006862101

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2002

12 mars 2002

Section 6 of the 1998 Act provides (so far as relevant): “(1) It is unlawful for a public authority to act in a way which is incompatible with a Convention right. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to an

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708DEC000596402

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2004

8 juillet 2004

On 30 December 1996 the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Adygheya Republic quashed the judgment of 17 May 1993 by way of supervisory review proceedings and remitted the case for a new examination.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0412DEC000012804

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2011

12 avril 2011

By letter of 8 September 2010, the Government sent a unilateral declaration, providing as follows: “The Government declares, by a way of this unilateral declaration, its acknowledgement of the excessive

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404JUD001722906

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2017

4 avril 2017

  1 to the Convention concerning the quashing by way of supervisory review of final domestic judgments in the applicants’ favour admissible;   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1119DEC002790310

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2013

19 novembre 2013

    In response, the applicant company challenged the notice of enforcement by way of an objection ( námietky ) lodged with the Enforcement Court, arguing that the judgment of the Supreme Court

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114630

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2012

18 octobre 2012

The only way to apply it in a way which is consistent with the egalitarian intention of the legislation is to do so irrespective of the sexual orientation of the cohabiting couple.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0618DEC006368400

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2002

18 juin 2002

The Human Rights Act 1998 (“the 1998 Act”) Section 3(1) of the 1998 Act provides: “So far as it is possible to do so, primary legislation and subordinate legislation must be read and given effect in a way

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0211DEC002978020

Admin. suprême

11 février 2025

11 février 2025

By way of judgment no. 259/2015 of 2 December 2015, the Constitutional Court declared the impugned Resolution unconstitutional and null and void.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601JUD000706405

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2006

1 juin 2006

The pan had no cover but it was separated from the living area by a one-metre-high brick wall and an additional curtain of 1.2 metre in height.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0713JUD007225001

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2010

13 juillet 2010

They hit his head against the wall, twisted his arms, punched his neck and kicked him in the groin. The beatings alternated with admonitions to him to confess.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1209DEC006293600

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2004

9 décembre 2004

The walls of the “stone hole” were covered with sharp-edged reinforced concrete lining ( «бетонная шуба» ).

Source officielle