CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0114JUD000237603
14 janvier 2010
If, however, the offender cannot be found at the address he specified and his new address is unknown, a note to this effect is made on the decision and it is considered as served on the date of the note
Page 88 sur 145
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0130JUD005000112
30 janvier 2020
The name and address of the allocation holder; 3. The date of birth in the case of natural persons; 4.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0119JUD002184013
19 janvier 2021
The officers threatened to take her to the forest, rape and kill her, if she refused to tell them his address. The fourth applicant told them the address and they went to the first applicant’s house.
CHAMBRE 8 SECTION 4
6a226387cdc6046d4739469c
4 juin 2026
[E] [U] et Mme [G] [M] un local à usage d'habitation situé [Adresse 3] à [Localité 6], moyennant un loyer mensuel de 700 euros hors charges.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005JUD001413903
5 octobre 2006
The Supreme Court did not address the applicant's inability to question the officer Kha.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0609JUD001078007
9 juin 2020
10780/07 was actually sent to that residential address but no reply was received (see paragraph 53 above).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0621JUD006670213
21 juin 2018
Merits 36.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1202JUD005315012
2 décembre 2014
In addition, it had allowed the applicant to address the court last in respect of the merits of the case. 31.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1212JUD006084619
12 décembre 2023
(ii) The content of the letter and the identity of the addressee should be taken into account in the assessment [and] the reasons for which dispatching the letter to that addressee poses a threat
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0611JUD003195311
11 juin 2015
execution by the Government of the Court’s judgment on the merits. 34.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1008JUD007187212
8 octobre 2015
On 25 January 2007 the postman tried (unsuccessfully) to serve the applicant with the court documents, including the claim, at her home address.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0507JUD001984009
7 mai 2013
It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1). THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0125JUD003167996
25 janvier 2000
The Court heard addresses by Mr Lagrange and Mr Popescu. THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0118JUD000043013
18 janvier 2022
as he had not been at that address. 25.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0210JUD003208419
10 février 2022
Merits Parties’ arguments 32.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325DEC000236208
25 mars 2014
In the filing registers, the name and address of the applicant had also been deleted.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1216DEC003182718
16 décembre 2020
The applicant did not currently reside at his son’s address.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0624DEC007288101
24 juin 2004
The applicant branch complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the first instance court failed to address two of the three grounds for the refusal of state re-registration.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0225DEC002226622
25 février 2025
The Tbilisi Court of Appeal did not address the complaint about Judge V.D.’s alleged lack of impartiality (see paragraph 9 above). 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1013JUD006958212
13 octobre 2015
(referred to as K.E. in the initial complaint) be called as a witness and gave his address.