declared admissible by the Commission on 8 July 1991, the applicants complained of the excessive length of certain civil proceedings;        Whereas in its report adopted on 1 April

the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas, at the 534th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies, held on 7 April

On 20 March 2008 the Supreme Court upheld the judgment of 3   April   2007 in the presence of the applicant and his lawyer.

On 12   April 2017 the investigator in charge of the applicant’s case commissioned a forensic psycholinguistic analysis of the applicant’s publication to assess its content.

(b)     with respect to the proceedings whereby the domestic courts dismissed as inadmissible the applicant’s request for contact rights with his children (final decision no. 182 of 30 April

  55385/14, § 42, 24 April 2018)?

Convention"),     Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 8 April

the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas, at the 491st meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 1 April

On 3 April 1992, the Benevento investigating judge ordered that the applicant be released .

been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;     Whereas in their application, declared admissible by the Commission on 1 April

proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 13 April

;    Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 27 April

xa0;    Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 4 April

proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicants, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 13 April

proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 13 April

proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 13 April

proposals made by the Commission when transmitting its report as regards just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant, proposals supplemented by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 13 April

the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas, at the 473rd meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 2 April

During the strip searches carried out on 7 and 21 March and on 4 April 2018 the applicant refused to remove his underwear.