CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0520DEC003176508
20 mai 2014
He also claimed that the Agency had failed to indicate all evidence used in the proceedings, and that the Supreme Court erroneously rejected his complaint in that regard without addressing its merits.
Page 86 sur 145
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0725JUD000272816
25 juillet 2017
The Higher Specialised Civil and Criminal Court (“the HSC”) examined the following cases on the merits and allowed appeals on points of law in situations where the defendants had pleaded
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD001204705
19 décembre 2017
Merits 39.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1020DEC005786014
20 octobre 2020
You address the administrative board, the legally elected body of the Notaries Chamber, in a particularly insulting manner.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0218JUD001899091
18 février 1997
The Court heard addresses by Mr Bratza, Mr Ziegler and Mr Boillat. AS TO THE FACTS I. Circumstances of the case 6.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0707JUD004555906
7 juillet 2015
grounds should be joined to the merits. 39.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0623JUD003431013
23 juin 2020
Merits The parties’ submissions 35.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0708DEC001522703
8 juillet 2003
In its judgment ( Merits ) of 19 September 2000 in the case of IJL, GMR and AKP v. the United Kingdom (nos. 29522/95, 30056/96 and 30574/96), the Court found that the respondent Government had breached
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1202JUD004699815
2 décembre 2021
Merits 41 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1105JUD003787108
5 novembre 2013
The Court also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1). THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1013DEC003229902
13 octobre 2005
She was not unable to express her own view, and was not merely repeating her mother’s views.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601JUD001204902
1 juin 2006
The applicant objected, but the District Court did not address her objections. On 6 December 2002 the hearing was adjourned until 10 January 2003 upon the applicant’s request. 25.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0321JUD007625411
21 mars 2019
The expert was asked to address a number of specific questions relevant to the determination of the pecuniary damage sustained. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0125DEC004702399
25 janvier 2001
He maintained that the Government had failed to establish that the court had attempted to summon them on several occasions, but had been unable to do so as their address in Bulgaria were unknown.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD000684608
9 juillet 2013
In consequence, the case was remitted to the Pezinok District Court for examination on the merits. 22.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513DEC000134912
13 mai 2014
The courts emphasised that the order did not imply that the first applicant should reside with either parent, but merely required that the status quo ante be restored so that questions of residence and
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1028JUD000533907
28 octobre 2010
It had tried to hear the limited partners as witnesses, but it had been impossible to summon any of them since they were all foreigners and none had a known address in Austria.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0330DEC000741202
30 mars 2006
On 7 January 2002 the applicant moved and settled in the Voronezh Region having notified the bailiffs of his new address.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0518DEC004555815
18 mai 2021
Incoming correspondence is to be passed on to the addressee upon inspection without delay, unless it (a) contains impermissible information or objects, or (b) is in a language different from
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918DEC000291211
18 septembre 2012
In the present case the applicant, by repeatedly complaining to the probation officer, had recourse to the remedy specifically designed to address his complaint about his father’s failure