In September 1999 the applicant was arrested by the German police in Hamburg and the Italian Minister of Justice requested his extradition.

), President , Elisabeth Palm (Swedish), Christos Rozakis (Greek), Nicolas Bratza (British), Matti Pellonpää (Finnish), Luigi Ferrari Bravo [1] (Italian), Gaukur Jörundsson (Icelandic), Georg Ress (German

the Federal Republic of Germany lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 30   December 2021 by a German

Section I] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for correspondence Large-scale seizure of computer files from lawyers’ office: no violation In 2006 proceedings were instituted against several Portuguese and German

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Armelle Geslan-Demaret, présidente de chambre, - et les conclusions de Mme Michèle Torelli, rapporteure publique.

Le rapport de Mme Armelle Geslan-Demaret, présidente rapporteure, a été entendu au cours de l'audience publique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

Le rapport de Mme Armelle Geslan-Demaret, présidente rapporteure, a été entendu au cours de l'audience publique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

Le rapport de Mme Armelle Geslan-Demaret, présidente-rapporteure, a été entendu au cours de l'audience publique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

Le rapport de Mme Armelle Geslan-Demaret, présidente-rapporteure, a été entendu au cours de l’audience publique.

Le rapport de Mme Armelle Geslan-Demaret, présidente-rapporteure, a été entendu au cours de l’audience publique.

Délibéré après l'audience du 12 décembre 2023, à laquelle siégeaient : Mme Geslan-Demaret, présidente de chambre, Mme Blin, présidente assesseure, M. Teulière, premier conseiller.

Saramati application in respect of Germany struck out : Mr Saramati initially contended that a German KFOR officer had been involved in his arrest.

  This request was rejected on 15 June 1983 on the ground that German judges were not authorised to perform official acts in Turkey.

The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs A. Wittling-Vogel, Ministerialdirigentin , of the German Ministry of Justice. 3.

Germany did not require a different point of view, because German courts were not bound by the decisions of that Court.

  The President gave the lawyer leave to use the German language in both the written and the oral proceedings (Rule 28 para. 3).

The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs A. Wittling-Vogel, of the Federal Ministry of Justice. 3.

by the European Court of Human Rights within the limits of a methodically arguable interpretation of the applicable German law.

An arrest warrant in respect of I.R. was issued by the German authorities. 12 .

His speech was not to be understood as such a denial, but as a criticism of the culture of remembrance, as upheld by the German establishment.