The applicants, in protest against the new law, presented a banner in the session hall and used a megaphone during the vote.

action also violated the specific regulation relating to the placement of particularly vulnerable categories of prisoners, such as former law-enforcement officers, like the applicant, in separate cells during

subsequently imposed a fine equivalent to EUR 694 for operating without a permit and confiscated a sum equivalent to EUR 21,347 representing the market value of the scrap iron collected for recycling during

During the demonstration the applicant’s mother gave a speech harshly criticising the Government.

In August-September 2012, during the elections to the Parliament of Ukraine, the applicants requested the Central Election Commission (the CEC) to provide them with the autobiographies and photos of all

: violation Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Ill-treatment during police intervention in dispute in restaurant: violation Article 5 Article 5-5 Compensation Absence of right to compensation

In 2004, following a change in the legislation during the proceedings, state security courts were abolished and the case was transferred from the Malatya State Security Court to the Malatya Assize Court

In particular, has there been a breach of Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention, as a result of the lack of legal assistance available to the applicants during the preliminary investigation (see Salduz v

Finally, the applicant complains that he was denied the assistance of a lawyer during his custody.

Nothing was found on any of the women during the searches.

When asked why he had made a different statement during the confrontation, A.S. replied that he had been afraid of the applicant causing him bodily harm. 21.

It appears that except for the first day, the applicant was detained in a hospital during the entire period.

    Holding of the defendants during the trial 41.

A third passenger of the car, Mr B.P., aged twenty-two, was seriously wounded during the shooting, but survived. 8.

Indeed during the trial by jury M. had indicated the applicant as the recipient.

During the inspection, the persons sitting in the cars put up resistance during which police officer R.M. accidentally fired shots from his service gun inflicting light injuries on two police officers

[who stated that] the servicemen had not been involved in detentions during the special operation.

During   the   applicant’s detention in the SIZO, an ambulance had been called for him once, on 9 June 2017, because of a sudden deterioration of his health.

    A number of witnesses were examined during the criminal proceedings.