Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-144049
14 avril 2014
14 avril 2014
The action started on 5 August. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0504DEC005746800
4 mai 2004
4 mai 2004
Facts after 30 April 1993 On 3 August 1993 an expert submitted his opinion to the court. The defendants' lawyer contested the expert's opinion.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-189700
9 janvier 2019
9 janvier 2019
In August 2013, due to aggravation of acute hemorrhoid symptoms, the applicant refused to work.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0824DEC001609590
24 août 1999
24 août 1999
On 22 August 1997 they submitted observations on admissibility. On 19 September 1997 the applicant was invited to submit observations in reply.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318DEC006650601
18 mars 2008
18 mars 2008
On 22 August 2000 the appeal was heard and dismissed. Another claim for widows’ benefits was made on 6 October 2000.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204713
27 août 2020
27 août 2020
On 30 August 2013 the CEC replied to the investigator that there was nothing it could do.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0824DEC001608090
24 août 1999
24 août 1999
On 22 August 1997 they submitted observations on admissibility. On 19 September 1997 the applicant was invited to submit observations in reply.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0824DEC001609390
24 août 1999
24 août 1999
On 22 August 1997 they submitted observations on admissibility. On 19 September 1997 the applicant was invited to submit observations in reply.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126683
2 septembre 2013
2 septembre 2013
By six judgments of the Banja Luka Court of First Instance (“the Court of First Instance”) of 17 February 2000, 25 October 2000, 12 December 2008, 8 July 2003, 11 February 2003 and 31 August 1999, which
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-109457
14 décembre 2011
14 décembre 2011
On 8 August 2005 the Gagarinskiy District Prosecutors’ Office took a fresh decision not to institute criminal proceedings. The applicant was not provided with a copy.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248648
17 décembre 2025
17 décembre 2025
On 4 August 2020 the Istanbul Governor’s Office ordered the applicant’s deportation pursuant to section 54(1)(d) of the Foreigners and International Protection Act (“Law no.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC004473510
14 janvier 2014
14 janvier 2014
On 16 August 2010 the applicant submitted a Rule 39 request which was refused by the President of the Section the next day. 5.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5295
6 juin 2002
6 juin 2002
On 6 August 1997 the applicant was committed for trial before the District Court, which ordered his continued detention without specifying any term.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-145737
26 juin 2014
26 juin 2014
Between 17 July 2012 and 15 August 2012 the applicants were detained at the Kumkapı Foreigners’ Removal Centre.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0824DEC001607490
24 août 1999
24 août 1999
On 22 August 1997 they submitted observations on admissibility. On 19 September 1997 the applicant was invited to submit observations in reply.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113JUD003151902
13 novembre 2008
13 novembre 2008
The applicant was requested to submit the relevant information by 29 August 2008.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-112401
19 mai 2009
19 mai 2009
Before that could happen, the applicant left Germany and applied for asylum in Belgium on 11 August 2008.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179046
3 novembre 2017
3 novembre 2017
On 8 August 2005 the applicant again applied for the suspension of the enforcement of the court decision of 7 July 2005.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1114DEC007786901
14 novembre 2006
14 novembre 2006
By a decision of 28 August 2000 the Płock District Court dismissed the applicants’ complaint.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217152
8 avril 2022
8 avril 2022
The application was allowed in a judgment of 1 August 2008 of the Kardzhali Regional Court.
Source officiellePage 86 sur 2136