It also concerns the applicant’s alleged inability to benefit from legal assistance following the withdrawal of her lawyer as noted by the trial court in its hearing held at 18 October 2007.

It further concerns the use by the trial court of the evidence given by his co-defendants under alleged duress and in the absence of a lawyer to convict the applicant (see, among many others, Gäfgen v.

Complaints under Articles 3 (both the substantive and procedural limb), 8, 13 and 14 of the Convention include that the investigation into the alleged ill-treatment has not been independent.

All applicants invoked Article 6 also in relation to the alleged overall unfairness of the proceedings, raising, in particular, various issues relating to the reasoning of the court decisions, evidence

: no violation   Article 34 Hinder the exercise of the right of petition Alleged obstacles in correspondence with the Court: no violation   Facts : The applicants, a couple and three of their

One of the applications also concerns the subsequent use by the trial court of those statements taken under alleged duress (see Özcan Çolak v.

CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Statuant tant sur le pourvoi principal formé par la société DCM Friesland que sur le pourvoi incident relevé par les sociétés Kärcher sas et Alfred

of official investigation into the alleged abduction and transfer of F.K.; (iii) the alleged absence of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints; (iv) the alleged breach of A.Y.’s right

The applicant requested that the alleged victim be examined again. On 12 April 2004 the alleged victim was examined by the investigating judge. 33.

    Principal facts   The applicants, Mark Lombardo, Charles Bonello, Alfred Debono and John Zammit, are Maltese nationals who were born in 1966, 1971, 1945 and 1963, respectively.

.) - 10513/03 Decision 4.1.2005 [Section IV] Article 5 Article 5-1 Deprivation of liberty Alleged deprivation of liberty for being held at police station on the basis of a deportation order subsequently

    Can the applicant still claim to be a victim of the alleged violation of Article 8 of the Convention, within the meaning of Article   34, in view of the level of compensation awarded

italic }   Communicated on 22 February 2018   SECOND SECTION Application no. 35819/09 Şevket AKTAŞ against Turkey lodged on 18 May 2009 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged

The article covered alleged corruption in the course of the renovation works of a State property in Sochi managed by the Directorate.

Decision 3.11.2015 [Section III] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Impartial tribunal Alleged lack of impartiality on account of Constitutional Court’s judge’s previous party political affiliation

He further alleged that there was not enough space for the outdoor daily walk and no activities were proposed to prisoners.

The prosecutors nevertheless considered that other evidence, such as testimony of those who had resided or worked at that foster home at the relevant time, including testimony of the alleged perpetrators

unfairness of the criminal proceedings against the applicant on account of his alleged inability to examine witness “X” whose statements were relied on by the trial court to convict him for murder of