The second document entitled ‘Address by Maskhadov, President of the Chechen Republic Ichkeria, to the European Parliament’ («Обращение Президента Чеченской Республики Ичкерия Масхадова к Европарламенту

On 15 December 1997 it was returned with the mention “addressee unknown”. 12.

  He was accused of having promised money and heroin to another person, for helping him to kill someone, and of having supplied a description and the address of the person to be killed.

If you wish to appeal against the decision, you are to address the appeal to the Administrative Court in [...].

  The Court heard addresses by Mr Bratza, Mr Levy and Mr Pannick. AS TO THE FACTS I.   the CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 7.     The applicant is a British citizen, born in 1984.

Under Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.

    The applicant and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1). 7.

Moreover, it also appeared from the Advocate General's letter of 9 November 1995 to counsel that he had proposed that the appeals be withdrawn for merely practical reasons.

It referred the case back to the Administrative Court for examination on the merits and instructed that the applicant be granted legal aid.

    The applicant and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1). 8.

  With regard to the dissolution itself, the question for the Court to address was whether the measure had been “necessary in a democratic society”.

In the present case such an appeal was in fact lodged and was examined on the merits by the Central Appeals Tribunal.   41.

the notice of the respondent Government         and invite them to submit written observations on its         admissibility and merits

        The applicant does not address this argument.

The chase after the deceased was merely to catch and detain. Wright had him under observation for a considerable period and over a comparatively long distance in these circumstances.

The applicants also attempted to obtain a residence registration for the first applicant at the second applicant's address, but in the absence of official registration of their marriage they were refused

It does not appear that the Federal Department merely repeated arguments which had already been raised before.

    Merits 1.     The parties’ submissions (a)     The applicant 49.

The case was transferred to Vayots Dzor Regional Court (the Regional Court) for examination on the merits on the same date.