CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

5 505 résultats pour « Foray »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-706

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2010

23 novembre 2010

Secondly, they had not stood by and done nothing: rather, they had placed themselves as a shield between the protesters and the parents and children at considerable cost to themselves, with forty-one officers

Source officielle

Page 85 sur 276

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

6ème chambre jugeant seule

ECLI:FR:CECHS:2025:496168.20250708

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2025

8 juillet 2025

protection rapproché d'un captage d'eau destinée à la consommation humaine, et l'aire ou les équipements de stockage des matières entrantes et des digestats sont distants d'au moins 35 mètres des puits et forages

Source officielle
CC

civ3

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:C300857

Cassation

7 décembre 2022

7 décembre 2022

et condamner la société Axa France IARD à garantir et rembourser le syndicat des copropriétaires du montant des travaux déjà effectués, l'arrêt retient que ces travaux consistaient en des travaux de forage

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1750

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2009

15 janvier 2009

The association sought to achieve that aim through its own newspaper, publications, library and website and by organising seminars, conferences and fora.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213JUD002642907

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2016

13 décembre 2016

It also claimed that it had been unable to apply for a new permit forty-five days prior to the expiry of its existing environmental permit on 31 January 2005, as the new order had entered into force on

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1007JUD000552905

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2008

7 octobre 2008

    The applicants are forty-eight Hungarian nationals (see Appendix). A.     The circumstances of the case 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-118691

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2013

22 mars 2013

The applicant was held in the unit for three hours and forty minutes. He was told that the head of the police department, who was taking part in the public celebrations, wanted to talk to him.

Source officielle
TA

4ème Chambre

DTA_2304615_20260312

Administratif

12 mars 2026

12 mars 2026

devoir mettre en œuvre une modalité technique qui n’est ni définie, ni encadrée d’avance ; - la prescription par le deuxième alinéa du A l’article 38 du règlement de voirie de traversée en fonçage ou forage

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159429

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2015

23 novembre 2015

On 10 May 2007 the General Assembly of the Forensic Medicine Institute, composed of forty-three doctors, rendered an expert report in which references were made to the medical documents mentioned in the

Source officielle
TA

2ème Chambre

DTA_2003806_20230914

Administratif

14 septembre 2023

14 septembre 2023

secteurs où () l'existence de risques naturels () justifie[nt] que soient interdites les constructions et installations de toute nature, permanentes ou non, les plantations, dépôts, affouillements, forages

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1129JUD001120984

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 1988

29 novembre 1988

The applicants noted that a person arrested under the ordinary law of Northern Ireland must be brought before a Magistrates’ Court within forty-eight hours (see paragraph 32 above); and that under the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155786

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2015

1 juin 2015

years of age or more, or brother or sister of her husband or his wife who is forty-five years of age or more, and who has lived with the tenant for four years out of the last five years before 1st June

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114060

Admin. suprême

24 septembre 2012

24 septembre 2012

Consequently, the judge had to confine himself or herself to the issue of whether or not it was necessary to extend detention beyond forty-eight hours for investigative purposes.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410JUD004116807

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2018

10 avril 2018

They also complained that the investigator who had lodged the application for remand had acted outside his competence and that the detention orders had been issued more than forty-eight hours after the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010JUD003727208

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2017

10 octobre 2017

He refused the assistance of a lawyer and gave a statement of forty-nine pages in length in which he admitted his membership of the PKK and gave detailed information about the organisation and its members

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159287

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2015

19 novembre 2015

On 11 February 2009 the applicant complained to the prosecutor’s office about his unrecorded detention and belated – outside of the forty-eight hours’ statutory time-limit – court authorisation of his

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0324JUD001162007

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2015

24 mars 2015

    On 3 March 2006 the applicant appealed on points of law, arguing in particular that the request for his extradition had been sent by the Greek authorities after the forty-day time-limit provided

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1687

Admin. suprême

24 février 2009

24 février 2009

At the time forty-odd applications concerning lack of medical care in Georgian prisons were pending before the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104DEC005006307

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2008

4 novembre 2008

On 9   November 2007 the Solomyanskiy District Court of Kyiv ordered the applicant’s detention for forty days pending an official request for his extradition to Belarus and in order to effect his

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0626DEC001798402

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2003

26 juin 2003

On forty six days between 21 January and 20 October 1999 the Regional Court held trial hearings.

Source officielle