The Łódź Governor pointed out several shortcomings of the decision in question, in particular he found that it had been rendered while the demolition order had been in force and that the rules relating

correctly dismissed because they had not been proven”.

Berro-Lefèvre, judges, and Mr V. Berger , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 18 January 2007, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

On 6   March   2003 the Constitutional Court deciding on the applicant’ further appeal found that there had been no delays which could have been attributed solely to the courts.

    He also complained that he had not been given a fair trial and that the principle of presumption of innocence had been violated as the courts had wrongly assessed the evidence and had been

  The Government stated that the use of force had been absolutely necessary, justified and proportionate.

The fact that Mr Da Silveira was a lawyer, as well as the tenant of the premises, had been clear from the start of the search.

THE LAW The applicant argued that the criminal proceedings against her had been unfair, because her lawyer had neither been granted access to the case file nor been awarded an opportunity to make a statement

Thiriez, Maître des requêtes, - les observations de Me Choucroy, avocat de la société des Etablissements Jean Berne, - les conclusions de M.

X..., voyageant à bord d'un train pris à Barcelone pour se rendre à Berne via Avignon et Genève, a été découvert le 7 mai 1997 gravement blessé sur la voie ferrée ; que la Caisse nationale suisse, dite

A B qui concluent aux mêmes fins et soutient en outre que le préfet en ne se déplaçant pas sur place pour constater les éléments présents au 5 chemin Pavé à Bernes-sur-Oise a entaché sa décision d'une

#Niet-nakoming - Niet-toetreding, binnen gestelde termijn, tot Berner Conventie voor de bescherming van werken van letterkunde en kunst (Akte van Parijs van 24 juli 1971) - Niet-nakoming van verplichtingen

AG had contained an error in that one particular price had been multiplied by 100.

The applicants finally maintained that they had been deprived of their right to defend themselves by a lawyer.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention;   3.

He maintained that the decision to reject his request for an old-age pension had not been adequately reasoned and had failed to state laws on which it had been based.

hearing had been held in the proceedings and the public prosecutor’s written opinion against her release had not been notified to her or her lawyer. 28.

-K. had not been heard again in the new proceedings before the District Court.