CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115DEC001796314
15 novembre 2016
On 7 August 2012 the Administrative Court partially granted the applicant’s claims.
Page 85 sur 2136
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-142798
2 avril 2014
The applicant’s own appeal is dated 2 August 2009, was addressed directly to Supreme Court, and was received there on 5 August 2009. 19.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0206DEC007496301
6 février 2007
A hearing held on 3 August 1999 was adjourned with a view to obtaining the parties’ observations in reply to the counterclaim.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0925DEC001728302
25 septembre 2006
Thus, the statutory period of the applicant’s detention on remand expired on 8 August 1999.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0324DEC002079714
24 mars 2020
By contrast, by staying in the private fund, the amount theoretically available from the private fund amounted to only HUF 18,928 (approximately EUR 60) per month, as of 12 August 2013.
ECLI:CEDH:001-113191
29 août 2012
Both complaints were dismissed on 7 August 2006.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0329DEC000729210
29 mars 2016
The most recent decision addressed to him by a letter dated 2 September 2015 suspends his enlistment until 31 August 2016. 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0918DEC004982099
18 septembre 2001
On 31 August 1999, after a hearing held on 24 August 1999, the Hague Regional Court decided on the applicant's appeal of 9 August 1999 against his placement in aliens' detention.
TRIBUNAL_UE
ECLI:EU:T:2012:5
12 janvier 2012
#August Storck KG κατά Γραφείο Εναρμονίσεως στο πλαίσιο της Εσωτερικής Αγοράς (εμπορικά σήματα, σχέδια και υποδείγματα) (ΓΕΕΑ).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1211DEC003123806
11 décembre 2007
On 21 August 1995 the District Court on the bailiff’s request clarified the judgment and obliged the Government to pay the manufacturer the difference between the price for the car to be paid by the applicant
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1884225-1978810
20 décembre 2006
The decision contained references to various expert reports, but not to the report of 4 August 1986.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0824DEC001608990
24 août 1999
On 22 August 1997 they submitted observations on admissibility. On 19 September 1997 the applicant was invited to submit observations in reply.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0824DEC001609990
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011DEC003166506
11 octobre 2011
PECINCU Diana 16 August 1972, Iasi 687 7. VLAD Cecilia-Sorina 26 February 1973, Brad 721 8. DRAIA Sanda-Ioanela 4 June 1972, Deva 772 9. PINTEA Angela-Cristina 4 August 1971, Cimpeni 89 10.
ECLI:CEDH:001-123856
11 juillet 2013
On 6 August 2012 the Department of Penitentiary Institutions replied: “It has been found that you are under medical surveillance in Prison no. 11 with the diagnosis: “Noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
ECLI:CEDH:001-127704
2 octobre 2013
The applicant was repeatedly hospitalised in a psychiatric hospital in Morawica from 4 to 25 July 2002 and subsequently from 29 June 2006 until 2 August 2006, from 17 August 2006 until 14 September 2006
ECLI:CEDH:001-187355
2 octobre 2018
On 29 August 2006 the Ivano-Frankivsk Town Court ruled in her favour and invalidated the disputed contract.
ECLI:CEDH:001-158678
19 octobre 2015
In August 2008 he travelled from Saint Petersburg to Georgiyevsk for a holiday in an ancestral home.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0202DEC003146606
2 février 2016
The applicant was informed of the order on 15 August 2005. The applicant left Russia on 25 September 2005.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0824DEC001607590