CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

27 275 résultats pour « Wayl »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0904DEC005472500

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2003

4 septembre 2003

On 25 July 1994 the applicants were granted leave to apply for judicial review by way of an order of mandamus in respect of the Council’s failure to maintain the road.

Page 84 sur 1364

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0928JUD002424704

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2006

28 septembre 2006

    The Court will firstly examine the applicants' complaint concerning the quashing of the judgments in their favour by way of supervisory-review proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0613JUD005878113

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2017

13 juin 2017

His statement had not implied dishonesty by A or insinuated criminal behaviour in any way, nor could it have been perceived to do so.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1967:0711DEC000274966

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 1967

11 juillet 1967

In particular, Article 5 invoked by the Applicant, is irrelevant in this context because the actions here complained of in no way affected the rights to liberty and security of the person secured to the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0922DEC001843905

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2015

22 septembre 2015

On 30   January 1997 R.S concluded a provisional contract with the NHA for the sale of the flat, while the final contract of sale by way of payment of instalments ( kontratë për shitje apartamenti

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0403DEC000265418

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2018

3 avril 2018

The appeal was dismissed by way of decision promulgated on 29 March 2016. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0427DEC000837403

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2004

27 avril 2004

The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0614JUD000487403

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2007

14 juin 2007

    On 14 August 2002 the Presidium of the Astrakhan Regional Court, by way of supervisory-review proceedings, quashed the judgments and remitted the cases for re-examination.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-225616

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2023

1 juin 2023

inadequate conditions of detention during transport - Transport on multiple occasions between 24/01/2019 and 31/03/2022, between 0.2 and 0.25 sq. m. of personal space, transport time - 2 hours per one-way

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0218JUD000344706

Admin. suprême

18 février 2010

18 février 2010

    On 12 March 2004 the Presidium of the Supreme Court of Russia, by way of supervisory review proceedings, quashed the judgment of 25   October 2002 in the part obliging the respondent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1010JUD003218502

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2013

10 octobre 2013

    The applicant complained about the quashing, by way of supervisory review, of the court final decision of 20   December 2001 in her favour.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0927DEC005674500

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2005

27 septembre 2005

1999, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Wayne

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0309DEC006481201

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2004

9 mars 2004

The concrete walls of the prison had made him ill with tuberculosis for which he could be adequately treated only if he were at liberty.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0222DEC000684702

Admin. suprême

22 février 2005

22 février 2005

Walls were covered with so-called shuba , a sort of thorny concrete lining, designed to prevent detainees from leaning on the walls.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0731JUD004223902

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2008

31 juillet 2008

The walls had been covered with so-called shuba , a sort of abrasive concrete lining, designed to prevent detainees from leaning on them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9722

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 1993

26 octobre 1993

  Costs and expenses: reimbursed in full less amount paid by way of legal aid. Conclusion : respondent State to pay specified sum to applicant (unanimously).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-172730

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2017

15 mars 2017

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Did the domestic court’s refusal [3] to reduce the applicant’s sentence of imprisonment amount to a breach of Article 7 of the Convention (see, by way of comparison, Del Río Prada

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202729

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2020

3 avril 2020

The light functioned in the same way. Detainees had to scream for the warden’s attention, and their screams often went unheard or were ignored.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-196465

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2019

12 septembre 2019

Did they consider the way in which the applicant should have become aware that the song had been declared extremist?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216650

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2022

2 mars 2022

However, during the proceedings, in 2008, the title of one of the previous owners of the building was cancelled by way of a late revision request which led to the reversal of a final court judgment of

Source officielle