CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

7 691 résultats pour « Chilly »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-424060-424448

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2001

2 octobre 2001

  Summary of the facts   In a decision of 3 May 1993 the Paris Social Services, Youth and Health Department rejected the applicant’s request for preliminary leave to adopt a child.

Source officielle

Page 84 sur 385

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10325

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2015

20 janvier 2015

At the material time Turkish civil law recognised the right of persons wishing to adopt as a single parent to give their surname to their adopted child, but did not provide for a regulatory framework for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-614

Admin. suprême

1 février 2011

1 février 2011

unlawfully removed from Germany to Portugal and the custody of that child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2353

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2007

20 décembre 2007

The limitation period for an application by the child under the Act was three years from the date the child attained its majority or, in the case of children who had already attained their majority, three

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4982

Admin. suprême

18 février 2003

18 février 2003

The divorce, pronounced in July 1994, awarded custody of the minor child to the mother, whilst deferring the decision on whether to grant any access and/or overnight visiting rights to the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0909DEC002774495

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2003

9 septembre 2003

When assessing the possibilities for terminating the public care of S. in the light of the best interests of the child, the duration of public care and the interaction between the child and the parents

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1003JUD001698612

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2017

3 octobre 2017

Accordingly, the situation of a woman with a child aged under one and that of a man with a child of the same age were not comparable. 61.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1008JUD005616312

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2015

8 octobre 2015

He also invokes Article 13 paragraph 1 (b) [of the Hague Convention] which provides that the court is not bound to order the return of a child if it establishes that the return would expose the child to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0706JUD006618009

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2021

6 juillet 2021

There was therefore no evidence that it was “totally impossible” for her to take care of the child and that the child was deprived of maternal care. 33.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002243093

Admin. suprême

9 juin 1998

9 juin 1998

The Court of Cassation has also held that a parent does not have to have lost all interest in the child: it suffices that the behaviour of a parent living with the child seriously and irremediably jeopardises

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9853

Admin. suprême

22 avril 1992

22 avril 1992

  SCOPE OF THE CASE As delimited by Commission's admissibility decision, case concerned only applicant's complaint that Swedish authorities had hindered reunion with his child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4846

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2003

27 mai 2003

.) - 69498/01 Decision 27.5.2003 [Section IV] Article 14 Discrimination Exclusion of adopted child from inheritance: admissible The applicants are an adopted son and his mother.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-52

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2012

17 janvier 2012

: no violation   Facts – The applicant newspaper published two articles concerning the case of C, a child who had been ill-treated and sexually abused by her father and stepmother.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12304

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2018

11 décembre 2018

She was taken to a hospital maternity ward: the child weighed 2.2   kg and measured 49   cm. The mother and child left hospital a week later, in good health.

Source officielle
CE

1ère sous-section jugeant seule

CETAT:CETATEXT000025041164

Admin. suprême

23 décembre 2011

23 décembre 2011

enregistrés les 18 avril et 3 mai 2011 au secrétariat du contentieux du Conseil d'Etat, présentés pour l'ASSOCIATION FRATERNITE MEDICO-SOCIALE DU TRAVAIL, dont le siège est 1, route de la Glandée à Chailly-en-Bière

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-210109

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2021

22 avril 2021

According to the applicant, the mother obstructed his contacts with the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7164

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2000

5 septembre 2000

He was appointed co-guardian of the child by the District Court, whilst the mother was guardian.

Source officielle
TA

Reconduite à la frontière

DTA_2602651_20260310

Administratif

10 mars 2026

10 mars 2026

B..., représenté par Me Chelly, doit être considéré comme demandant au tribunal : 1°) de l’admettre au bénéfice de l’aide juridictionnelle ; 2°) d’annuler les arrêtés du 5 février 2026 par lesquels

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3047

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2006

9 novembre 2006

His claim was dismissed, the court relying, in particular, on the results of a blood test which concluded that he could be the child's father, and on the fact that the child was born in wedlock.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3390

Admin. suprême

18 avril 2006

18 avril 2006

After Mrs Dickson had been released the couple requested artificial insemination facilities to enable them to have a child together, arguing that it would not otherwise be possible, given Mr Dickson’s

Source officielle