CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-424060-424448
2 octobre 2001
Summary of the facts In a decision of 3 May 1993 the Paris Social Services, Youth and Health Department rejected the applicant’s request for preliminary leave to adopt a child.
Page 84 sur 385
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10325
20 janvier 2015
At the material time Turkish civil law recognised the right of persons wishing to adopt as a single parent to give their surname to their adopted child, but did not provide for a regulatory framework for
ECLI:CEDH:002-614
1 février 2011
unlawfully removed from Germany to Portugal and the custody of that child.
ECLI:CEDH:002-2353
20 décembre 2007
The limitation period for an application by the child under the Act was three years from the date the child attained its majority or, in the case of children who had already attained their majority, three
ECLI:CEDH:002-4982
18 février 2003
The divorce, pronounced in July 1994, awarded custody of the minor child to the mother, whilst deferring the decision on whether to grant any access and/or overnight visiting rights to the applicant.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0909DEC002774495
9 septembre 2003
When assessing the possibilities for terminating the public care of S. in the light of the best interests of the child, the duration of public care and the interaction between the child and the parents
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1003JUD001698612
3 octobre 2017
Accordingly, the situation of a woman with a child aged under one and that of a man with a child of the same age were not comparable. 61.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1008JUD005616312
8 octobre 2015
He also invokes Article 13 paragraph 1 (b) [of the Hague Convention] which provides that the court is not bound to order the return of a child if it establishes that the return would expose the child to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0706JUD006618009
6 juillet 2021
There was therefore no evidence that it was “totally impossible” for her to take care of the child and that the child was deprived of maternal care. 33.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002243093
9 juin 1998
The Court of Cassation has also held that a parent does not have to have lost all interest in the child: it suffices that the behaviour of a parent living with the child seriously and irremediably jeopardises
ECLI:CEDH:002-9853
22 avril 1992
SCOPE OF THE CASE As delimited by Commission's admissibility decision, case concerned only applicant's complaint that Swedish authorities had hindered reunion with his child.
ECLI:CEDH:002-4846
27 mai 2003
.) - 69498/01 Decision 27.5.2003 [Section IV] Article 14 Discrimination Exclusion of adopted child from inheritance: admissible The applicants are an adopted son and his mother.
ECLI:CEDH:002-52
17 janvier 2012
: no violation Facts – The applicant newspaper published two articles concerning the case of C, a child who had been ill-treated and sexually abused by her father and stepmother.
ECLI:CEDH:002-12304
11 décembre 2018
She was taken to a hospital maternity ward: the child weighed 2.2 kg and measured 49 cm. The mother and child left hospital a week later, in good health.
1ère sous-section jugeant seule
CETAT:CETATEXT000025041164
23 décembre 2011
enregistrés les 18 avril et 3 mai 2011 au secrétariat du contentieux du Conseil d'Etat, présentés pour l'ASSOCIATION FRATERNITE MEDICO-SOCIALE DU TRAVAIL, dont le siège est 1, route de la Glandée à Chailly-en-Bière
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-210109
22 avril 2021
According to the applicant, the mother obstructed his contacts with the child.
ECLI:CEDH:002-7164
5 septembre 2000
He was appointed co-guardian of the child by the District Court, whilst the mother was guardian.
Reconduite à la frontière
DTA_2602651_20260310
10 mars 2026
B..., représenté par Me Chelly, doit être considéré comme demandant au tribunal : 1°) de l’admettre au bénéfice de l’aide juridictionnelle ; 2°) d’annuler les arrêtés du 5 février 2026 par lesquels
ECLI:CEDH:002-3047
9 novembre 2006
His claim was dismissed, the court relying, in particular, on the results of a blood test which concluded that he could be the child's father, and on the fact that the child was born in wedlock.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3390
18 avril 2006
After Mrs Dickson had been released the couple requested artificial insemination facilities to enable them to have a child together, arguing that it would not otherwise be possible, given Mr Dickson’s