CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD004622711
12 décembre 2017
Turkey ((dec.), no. 29870/96, 25 May 2000), and Tanışma v. Turkey (no. 32219/05, §§ 29-47, 17 November 2015). THE LAW I. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE CONVENTION 7.
Page 83 sur 1165
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913DEC001277812
13 septembre 2016
Turkey , no. 30471/08, 22 September 2009, and Yarashonen v. Turkey , no. 72710/11, 24 June 2014).
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-188057
5 novembre 2018
Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, ECHR 2008, Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541/08 and 3 others, 13 September 2016; Özcan Çolak v. Turkey , no.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0515DEC002317994
15 mai 1995
Turkey (Dec. 19.10.94), where it held that, although the destruction of houses and property has been a frequent occurrence in South-East Turkey, the Government had failed to provide clear examples of effective
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0123JUD001518505
23 janvier 2018
Turkey (dec.), no. 39706/98, 7 November 2000, and Okul v. Turkey (dec.), no. 45358/99, 4 September 2003).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0203JUD004122007
3 février 2009
Turkey , no. 33431/02, §§ 11-18, 7 October 2008, and Turgut and Others v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616DEC002377213
16 juin 2015
Turkey (nos.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-51991
22 avril 1998
s2ED52ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:13pt } RESOLUTION DH (98) 82 HUMAN RIGHTS APPLICATIONS Nos. 15530/89 AND 15531/89 MITAP AND MÜFTÜO_LU AGAINST TURKEY
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3035698-3369618
2 mars 2010
and live in Samsun (Turkey).
ECLI:CEDH:003-2324926-2495941
8 avril 2008
TURKEY (N° 1) YÜCEL v. TURKEY (N° 2) The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing its Chamber judgments [1] in the cases of Yücel v.
cr
6079a8599ba5988459c4cdc4
15 octobre 2002
qu'elle a été rédigée par un des membres d'Air Tahiti sans contreseing des inspecteurs (arrêt p. 52 et 53) ; que l'enquête du BEA a également stigmatisé l'absence de contrôle de l'administration de tutelle
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0116JUD000788608
16 janvier 2018
Turkey (no. 16330/02, §§ 13-15, 20 May 2008); Aydemir and others v. Turkey ((dec.), nos.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1209JUD001197603
9 décembre 2008
Turkey (no. 3) , no. 42590/98, 20 December 2005; Halis Doğan v. Turkey (no. 2) , no. 71984/01, 25 July 2006; Karakoyun and Turan v. Turkey , no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0310JUD007191201
10 mars 2009
Turkey (dec.), no. 45907/99, 22 October 2002).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1126DEC007529711
26 novembre 2019
Turkey , no. 38740/09, 23 October 2018; Ömer Güner v. Turkey , no. 28338/07, 4 September 2018; Girişen v. Turkey , no. 53567/07, 13 March 2018; Canşad and Others v. Turkey , no.
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2875070-3162105
2 octobre 2009
Turkey (No. 4) (nos.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0926DEC001609190
26 septembre 2002
Turkey (op. cit.).
ECLI:CEDH:001-165333
30 juin 2016
Turkey , nos. 26938/08, 41039/09, 66328/09 and 66451/09, 5 June 2012).
ECLI:CEDH:001-162083
14 mars 2016
Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, 27 November 2008). QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Having regard to his conviction on 31 March 2010 (decision no.
ECLI:CEDH:001-196118
28 août 2019
Turkey (No. 38114/03, 6 October 2009).