The applicant remained silent. Medical documents and an inquiry in respect of the applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment 10 .

Moreover, counsel, who had lengthy experience in handling criminal cases, chose for tactical reasons to remain silent about the difficulties (see paragraphs 11 and 13 above) and there was nothing to indicate

The court decision was silent in respect of the other two charges against the applicant: the extortion from Mr S. and the interference with the gas pipeline repairs.

    Paragraph 2 of Section 64 imposes an obligation on the Court to demand an explanation of the reasons why the administrative body remained silent.

He stated that he understood the charges and wished to exercise his right to remain silent. He did not make any reference to being ill ‑ treated after his arrest.

The right not to incriminate oneself is primarily concerned, however, with respecting the will of the accused person to remain silent.

The planned event would represent a silent twenty minute long flash mob (“the IDAHO event”).

The decision further read that the applicant had been questioned at the Drug Control office and that he had chosen to remain silent.

The applicant used his right to remain silent. 8.

Moreover, the domestic judicial authorities had been silent as to how, specifically, the expression “ sânge în instalaţie ” had, in their view, “significantly overstepped the limits of propriety inherent

The applicant signed the document, specifying that he did not require the assistance of a lawyer at that stage, and that he would exercise his right to remain silent. 11.

          When the charge was read out to the applicant, he chose to remain silent but was threatened with further proceedings for contempt of Parliament.

        The leadership of the Kurdish National Resistance Movement is not       acting sufficiently sensibly either and prefers to remain silent.

According to the applicant, at the moment of arrest he was walking down the street on pedestrian sidewalk keeping silent and not holding any banners. The applicant was taken to the police station.

The Government's submissions were silent on the continued non-enforcement of the judgment of 31 May 2001. 27.

In May 2008 outside a Government building in Chişinau’s main square he staged a silent protest about his brother’s arrest and detention a few days’ earlier.

The first applicant remained silent in response to those questions. 36.     At approximately 8.30 a.m.

the misuse of the new-style caution, his core rights had already been made clear to him: he was entitled to legal advice (which had been delayed for public safety reasons); he was entitled to remain silent

Soldiers E and I were silent about their involvement in other incidents. Preliminary hearing on disclosure 18 .

The applicant also alleged that he had not been informed of his right to remain silent during the interviews (see the relevant domestic law and practice in paragraph 70 below). 24.