collection and storing of data by security services on particular individuals, even without the use of covert surveillance methods, constituted an interference with these persons' private lives (see Rotaru

  Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, ECHR 2000-II, §§ 55 and 56; Rotaru v.   Romania [GC], no.   28341/95, ECHR 2000-V, §§ 55-63; Hasan and Chaush v.

Sweden , 26   March   1987, § 48, Series A no. 116, and Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no.   28341/95, § 46, ECHR 2000 ‑ V). 43.

  161, and Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 67, ECHR 2000 ‑ V). 71.

  28114/95, §   44, ECHR 1999-VI; and   Rotaru v. Romania   [GC], no.   28341/95, §   35, ECHR 2000-V). 28.

nationality, the freedom to leave any country, including his or her own, and that the corresponding obligations to respect this right are incumbent on the Contracting States (see, with respect to nationals, Rotaru

sufficient precision the conditions in which a measure may be applied, to enable the persons concerned – if need be, with appropriate advice – to regulate their conduct accordingly (see, for example, Rotaru

  28 114/95 , §   44, ECHR 1999-VI; and Rotaru v.   Romania [GC], no.   28341/95 , §   35, ECHR 2000-V).

  55565/00, ECHR   2006 ‑ XV, and Rotaru v. the Republic of Moldova , no. 26764/12, 8 December 2020).

The Court further considers that while failure to provide food in accordance with the general nutritional tables and menus in prison may put at risk the health of detainees (compare Rotaru v.

some basis in domestic law, but also refers to the quality of the law in question, which should be accessible to the person concerned and foreseeable as to its effects (see, among other authorities, Rotaru

Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, §§ 65 and 69, ECHR 2000-II; Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, §§ 43 and 46, ECHR 2000-V; and Glukhin v. Russia , no. 11519/20, § 67, 4 July 2023). 47.

  Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 56, ECHR 2000-II; and Rotaru v.   Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 55, ECHR 2000-V).

allegation of poor food in prison, the Court notes that, while failure to provide food in accordance with the general nutritional tables and menus in prison may put the health of detainees at risk (compare Rotaru

Accordingly, it joins any issue of exhaustion of domestic remedies to the merits of the application (see, for example, Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no.   28341/95, § 40, ECHR 2000-V).

  25390/94, § 34, ECHR 1999 ‑ III; Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no.   28341/95, § 55, ECHR 2000 ‑ V; and Maestri v.

  24029/07, § 188, 13   November 2012, and Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no.   28341/95, §§ 43-44, ECHR 2000-V).

  31/1954”), which was applicable at that time, are set out in Rotaru v.   Romania ([GC], no. 28341/95, § 29, ECHR 2000-V). 38.

manière significative le site Natura 2000 Rade d'Hyères, bordé par le projet ; le site présente des baies abritant des herbiers de Posidonies, des continuités préservées avec les plages, et un littoral rocheux