Such procedure would not however deal with the merits of the decision, but merely with the method by which that decision was arrived at.

Admittedly, the remedy in question was an extraordinary one relating to the application of the law and not to the merits of the case.

The Court heard addresses by Mr Mucha, Mr Tyrell, Mr Hill and Mr   Moses. AS TO THE FACTS I.    PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE A.

The Court heard the addresses and submissions of Mr. Fifoot, Sir Francis Vallat and Mr. Slynn for the Government and of Mr. Sperduti, Mr. Opsahl and Mr.

She gave him her name and address. The applicant subsequently entered the woman’s house in the middle of the night and raped her.

Even though he had informed the prosecutor of his change of address, the address he had given appeared to be false as there was a convent at that address.

the respondent party’s opening address on the main action and the merits of the counter-action (albeit not the causation and quantum aspects of the latter claim), and had deliberated.

O. box address abroad of which he had informed me - which is the only address I know of - and asked him to inform me what was the actual position as regards his admission to the Prinsengrachtziekenhuis

(for example, the e-mail address).

specified in it (current or former address in the United Kingdom). 3.

According to a police report of 30   June 2008, she had left the country for Italy and her address abroad was unknown. 29 .

tabac à l'instar de "Fumer tue", portant notamment les mentions "Aimer tue", "Vivons" ; qu'en page 10, cinq méthodes pour conserver les cigares étaient exposées, avec des listes d'accessoires et les adresses

The Court heard addresses by Mr de Vey Mestdagh for the Government, by Mr Schermers for the Commission and by Ms Later for the applicant. AS TO THE FACTS I.

    Merits 1.     The parties’ submissions (a)     The applicant 41.

la violation des articles 593 du Code de procédure pénale, contradiction entre deux chefs de dispositif, manque de base légale ; "en ce que l'arrêt attaqué a prononcé un sursis à statuer sur le mérite

The Court heard addresses by Mr Martínez, Mr Guillot and Mrs Dubrocard. AS TO THE FACTS I.    CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 8.

  On the same date, i.e. on 20 June 1996, the Court of Appeal also ordered that no one should publish or reveal the name or address of the applicant's child, or publish or reveal any particulars or

It must therefore be joined to the merits. 43.

These issues relate to the merits of the applicant’s complaint under Article 2 of the Convention.