It did not contain any admission of guilt but did indicate that the applicant knew that the marked money had possibly come from Major R.V.

Moreover, the investigating authorities failed to secure any possible evidence to corroborate B.’s guilt.

first ‑ instance court had committed errors in the assessment of the evidence, that the establishment of the facts had been erroneous and that the court’s reasoning, leading to the finding of guilt

    The applicant appealed against the assessment of evidence relating to the question of guilt ( “bevisvurderingen under skyldspørsmålet ”) and the award of redress to X. 6.

qu'il sera seulement rappelé que le 20 novembre 2002, le parquet de Brest ouvrait une information contre X à la suite d'un vol avec effraction commis au Conquet, de vols suivis de destruction commis à Guilers

It recalls in that respect a distinction should be drawn between decisions which describe a “state of suspicion” and decisions which contain a “finding of guilt”; only the second category is incompatible

        When cross-examined, the applicant said that the interview with the       police in which he admitted his guilt was in the presence of his

  On the contrary, there is no      suggestion that the crucial evidence of the analysis of the      blood [sample] upon which guilt or innocence depended was

  Nor does the failure to mention particular facts when questioned or the failure to account for presence in a particular place in itself indicate guilt.

Error in the assessment of evidence in relation to the question of guilt (bevisbedømmelsen under skyld-spørgsmålet) cannot be a ground for appeal (section 335), but for a new trial.

Its subsequent liability was based on considerations of causality and did not imply any finding of guilt.

However, they were of the opinion that the wording of the decision of 3   September   2002 could not be interpreted as a pronouncement on the applicant’s guilt. 50.

Finally the court considered that the provisions of the BIBOB Act did not violate Article 6 § 2 as they did not entail any criminal procedure for the purpose of establishing a person’s guilt of a criminal

A.K. testified that he had merely told the applicant that there was evidence of his guilt.

à : Me Dan ZERHAT de l'AARPI OHANA ZERHAT Cabinet d'Avocats, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES Me Emmanuel MOREAU de la SELARL HOCHLEX, Postulant, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES Me Elisa GUEILHERS

EXPRO, JCP de [Localité 1] N° RG : 22/03732 Expéditions exécutoires Expéditions Copies délivrées le : 07.05.2026 à : Me Elisa GUEILHERS de la SELEURL ELISA GUEILHERS AVOCAT, avocat au barreau

In the judgments concerning the co-accused the courts were not called upon to determine the guilt of the applicant, but that of the co-accused.

He further argued that the charges laid against him by the Greek authorities were not based on serious indications of guilt. He submitted that he should therefore be released. 17.

on whether the applicant had been a member of the guild and had paid membership fees. 26.