The applicants complained of the difference in treatment between male and female personnel of police/penal system as regards entitlement to parental leave/sick child leave.

The child continued to live with his mother.

  In particular, while in Bergmann, the Hradec Králové Regional Court decided as early as on 7 February 2007 that the contact between the applicant and his child be forbidden (this judgment became

During the proceedings in question the applicant never applied for the presence of a bailiff during his meetings with the child. 8 .

  In particular, while in Bergmann, the Hradec Králové Regional Court decided as early as on 7 February 2007 that the contact between the applicant and his child be forbidden (this judgment became

  The application concerns the decision to take S.B. into public care in 1998 on account of presumptions that the child had been sexually abused by members of the applicants’ family.

parent, the age of the child, the child’s state of health and other relevant circumstances (Article   161 § 1).

child.

had committed the acts he stood accused of, the child had said he had not.

Only in vitro fertilisation with the use of ova from a donor would allow them to have a child of whom one of them is the genetic parent.

Le 21 juillet 2015, la société Extend Fragrances a déposé la marque 'Marie-Antoinette' au Brésil au Paraguay, au Chili et en Malaisie, en revendiquant un droit de priorité fondé sur sa marque européenne

He sought an order giving him parental responsibility for the child, which was granted by the Lisbon Family Affairs Court in 1994.

  The grandparents’ action to obtain custody of the child was unsuccessful and Mr Amanalachioai was not deprived of his parental rights.

sexual abuse by members of the family: violation   Facts : X, a child aged about 13, declared that she had been subjected to sexual abuse for seven years by six members of her family.

.) - 3890/11 Decision 18.6.2013 [Section I] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Order for return of child made pursuant to Brussels IIa Regulation without any examination of the merits in the

    The applicant is a mother of a lifelong disabled child E. born in 1997. Before 2015, the family lived in Uzbekistan, where E. was officially declared disabled in 1999.

Relying on the domestic law then applicable, the tribunal de grande instance found that, as an illegitimate child whose father had been married to a woman other than her mother when she was conceived,

  In addition, the Child Protection Act of 2000 created a State Child Protection Agency and regional Social Care Offices, which are competent, inter alia, to take protection measures in respect of

Under Article 80, once a child reaches the age of majority, no application to annul recognition of paternity may be brought by the mother of the child or the man whose paternity has been recognised.

Their child was born in the Netherlands. They are represented before the Court by Ms P. Kramer-Ograjensek, a lawyer practising in Sittard.