CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0608JUD005250220
8 juin 2023
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 of the Convention 6. The applicants complained principally of the deficiencies in the proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention.
Page 82 sur 69088
CASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-5584
3 juillet 2012
Partant, l’arrestation du requérant avait un but autre que celui prévu par l’article 5 § 1 de la Convention et était arbitraire.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1127JUD003740923
27 novembre 2025
THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION The lawfulness of the applicant’s initial detention Admissibility 14 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0622JUD007745012
22 juin 2017
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 (f) OF THE CONVENTION 48.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0726JUD003187219
26 juillet 2022
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0909JUD003013312
9 septembre 2021
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 17.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002JUD002249108
2 octobre 2012
Violation de l'article 5 - Droit à la liberté et à la sûreté (Article 5-1 - Arrestation ou détention régulière);Violation de l'article 5 - Droit à la liberté et à la sûreté (Article 5-3 - Caractère raisonnable
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605JUD006004510
5 juin 2012
5-1 - Arrestation ou détention régulière;Article 5-1-f - Extradition);Non-violation de l'article 5 - Droit à la liberté et à la sûreté (Article 5-1 - Arrestation ou détention régulière;Article 5-1-f -
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0914JUD004813916
14 septembre 2023
THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0610JUD002336115
10 juin 2021
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 5 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0527JUD006460312
27 mai 2021
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 OF THE CONVENTION 19.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0920JUD001162313
20 septembre 2022
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 OF THE CONVENTION 20.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1018JUD002569713
18 octobre 2016
There has accordingly been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the applicants’ detention in the above periods. III.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0613JUD008168112
13 juin 2017
He also complained under Article 5 § 5 that he had not had access to any domestic remedy whereby he could obtain compensation for the alleged violations of his rights under Article 5. 66.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0504JUD002625015
4 mai 2023
THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0207JUD008454317
7 février 2023
The Court’s assessment (a) Article 5 § 1 35.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1113JUD002509215
13 novembre 2018
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 OF THE CONVENTION 24.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0321JUD000618220
21 mars 2024
Hungary , no. 62116/12, § 38, 22 September 2015) or Article 5 § 1 (b) (see O.M. v. Hungary , no. 9912/15, § 48, 5 July 2016, and M.H. and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1029JUD000391004
29 octobre 2013
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention;Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0109JUD004146711
9 janvier 2020
The applicant alleged under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention that his detention at the police station between 13 and 14 October 2010 had not been documented. 4.