CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0120JUD001494608
20 janvier 2015
in domestic law but also refers to the quality of the law in question, requiring that it should be accessible to the person concerned and foreseeable as to its effects (see, among other authorities, Rotaru
Page 82 sur 84
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0315JUD000723207
15 mars 2016
The Court observes that it has found in a number of cases concerning Prison no. 13 that the quantity and quality of food there were substandard (see, for instance, Rotaru v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1107JUD002120005
7 novembre 2017
Spain , 30 July 1998, § 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998‑V; Rotaru , cited above, § 55; Weber and Saravia , cited above, § 93; and Association for European Integration and Human
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0930JUD000842905
30 septembre 2014
need be with appropriate legal advice, to foresee the consequences of the domestic law for him, and fourth, the domestic law must be compatible with the rule of law (see, among many other authorities, Rotaru
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1203JUD003770005
3 décembre 2009
reiterates that a rule is “foreseeable” if it is formulated with sufficient precision to enable any individual – if need be with appropriate advice – to regulate his conduct (see, mutatis mutandis , Rotaru
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0320JUD001061406
20 mars 2012
Moldova , no. 12066/02, §§ 65-71, 19 June 2007; and Rotaru v. Moldova , no. 51216/06, §§ 33-42, 15 February 2011).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0629JUD001190102
29 juin 2006
Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 46, ECHR 2000 ‑ V). 57.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD002188507
16 janvier 2014
104-07, 3 November 2011), but also refers to the quality of the law in question, requiring that it should be accessible to the person concerned and foreseeable as to its effects (see Rotaru
7ème chambre - formation à 3
DCA_23LY03861_20241219
19 décembre 2024
effective « pour l’instant », mais qu’un accouplement avait été noté en 2016, deux individus volant de conserve ayant été aperçus le 5 mai dans la vallée de la Saliouse, avant de se poser sur un éperon rocheux
3ème Chambre
DTA_2102264_20240624
24 juin 2024
Le rapport d'expertise met notamment en évidence la présence d'éléments rocheux de diamètre important au sein des lits de pose et des zones d'enrobage dépassant largement les dimensions imposées par le
1re chambre - formation à 3
DCA_24DA00127_20241031
31 octobre 2024
En outre, la circonstance que l'ABF ait émis des réserves quant à la présence de parements rocheux dans le cadre d'un autre projet, sans en émettre dans le cadre du projet litigieux qui prévoit également
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1109JUD004298004
9 novembre 2010
paragraph 49 above) and there is nothing to suggest in the case that in paying it the authorities also acknowledged, expressly or in substance, alleged breaches of Article 2 of the Convention (see Rotaru
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0731JUD003666204
31 juillet 2012
secret surveillance of citizens, characterising as they do the police state, are tolerable under the Convention only in so far as strictly necessary for safeguarding the democratic institutions (see Rotaru
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD003855205
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0925JUD004478798
25 septembre 2001
reason that files gathered by security services on a particular individual fall within the scope of Article 8, even where the information has not been gathered by any intrusive or covert method (see Rotaru
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011DEC005084199
11 octobre 2001
Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI; and Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 35, ECHR 2000-V).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0106DEC001433605
6 janvier 2011
He argued that his case was identical to Rotaru v. Romania ([GC], no. 28341/95, ECHR 2000 ‑ V). 14 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD003019409
21 juin 2011
Switzerland ([GC], no. 27798/95, §§ 65-67, ECHR 2000-II, and Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, §§ 43-44, ECHR 2000-V).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1222JUD002860111
22 décembre 2015
exercise with sufficient clarity to give the individual adequate protection against arbitrary interference (see Malone v. the United Kingdom , 2 August 1984, §§ 66-68, Series A no. 82; Rotaru
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1018JUD006183810
18 octobre 2016
It must also be compatible with the rule of law (see, among many other authorities, Rotaru v.