The transcript of the hearing shows that the applicant expressly stated that he did not want a defence counsel and decided to remain silent. The applicant did not sign the transcript of the hearing.

    D.T. appealed, invoking, inter alia , his right to remain silent and to refuse to divulge information about defence witnesses or other evidence until the trial, as well as the fact that the

    The applicant was told of the incident on 15   or   16 April 1988 and ordered his men to remain silent. They returned to their camp at Bouar on 21   April.

He was accompanied by his chosen defence counsel and was notified of his right to remain silent and his obligation to testify truthfully, should he choose to answer questions.

    The Baku Court of Appeal’s judgment was silent as to the evidence submitted by the applicant (see paragraph 13 above). 16 .

    It appears that the policemen started to interview him on arrival, but that the applicant remained silent.

According to the record of the applicant’s questioning, the police warned him of his right not to incriminate himself and to remain silent and he expressly stated that his lawyer was M.R. 14.

The applicant signed the arrest record, noting that he had been informed of his constitutional rights as an accused, including the right to remain silent and to be assisted by counsel.

During the trial the applicant remained silent. On 13 July 2004 the Pula Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Puli ) found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to five months' imprisonment.

   The right to remain silent as a witness                (para. 86) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13    &#

He replied that there were no weapons in the house and they then ordered him to be silent. One of the armed men pressed his gun against the second applicant’s head.

The trial judge had accepted that, in remaining silent, the second applicant had followed her solicitor’s advice; he had nevertheless concluded that the tape recording called for an explanation from the

The appellate court was silent as to the first applicant’s particular complaints relating to the breach of his right to freedom of expression.

further emphasises that where access to a lawyer was delayed, and where the suspect was not notified of the right to legal assistance, the privilege against self-incrimination or the right to remain silent

of 3 October 2006 the Office of the Prosecutor General of Georgia informed the Azerbaijani authorities that the Georgian prosecuting authorities had questioned T.A., who had used his right to remain silent

He was informed of his right to remain silent and was accompanied by legal counsel. 9 .

  the   Netherlands , no. 37617/10, §   33, 28 August 2018, where the witness, an accomplice, was presented for cross ‑ examination but remained silent).

The checkpoint and its staff occupied two buildings; one was the building of the former Siluet clothing factory and the other was a nearby smaller building in Lenin Street. 7.

to consider answering questions formulated by counsel and put to him by the Regional Court, but refused to answer direct questions from the applicant or the defence, relying on his right to remain silent