CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

47 968 résultats pour « Ducuing »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0709DEC006467401

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2002

9 juillet 2002

He also complains that he was ill-treated during 21 days of solitary confinement. 2.

Source officielle

Page 81 sur 2399

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1023DEC002700495

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 1997

23 octobre 1997

Further, the pension payments suspended during imprisonment recommence on release at the appropriate updated level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0109DEC003984698

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2001

9 janvier 2001

The police allege that the applicant admitted his involvement in the murder during an interview in the afternoon of 22 October.

Source officielle
?

TRIBUNAL_UE

ECLI:EU:T:1998:101

droit européen

14 mai 1998

14 mai 1998

EC-Treaty - Concept of agreement - Information exchange - Order to desist - Fine - Determination of the amount - Statement of reasons - Mitigating circumstances - Rights of the defence - Cooperation during

Source officielle
?

TRIBUNAL_UE

ECLI:EU:T:1998:93

droit européen

14 mai 1998

14 mai 1998

(1) of the EC Treaty - Rights of the defence - Proof of participation in collusion - Information exchange - Order to desist - Fine - Statement of reasons - Determination of the amount - Cooperation during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1109DEC002819003

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2006

9 novembre 2006

The court used his testimony received during the preliminary investigation. K. and B. were questioned.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-52234

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2001

15 octobre 2001

been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention, on account of the lack of opportunity for the applicants to respond to the conclusions of the representative of the prosecutor’s office during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55992

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2001

15 octobre 2001

Belgian national, and that the Commission declared admissible the complaint that regarding of the lack of opportunity to respond to the conclusions of the representative of the prosecutor’s office during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55994

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2001

15 octobre 2001

regard to Interim Resolution DH (98) 133, regarding the fairness of hearings in proceedings before the Cour de Cassation, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 22 April 1998 at its 626th meeting during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-52236

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2001

15 octobre 2001

been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention on account of the lack of opportunity for the applicant to respond to the conclusions of the representative of the prosecutor’s office during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6218

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2001

22 novembre 2001

He referred to the applicant’s complaint that his son had been beaten by gendarmes during questioning lasting twenty days and that the gendarmes had stubbed their cigarettes out on his son’s body.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705DEC003266610

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2011

5 juillet 2011

The first and second applicants, both of whom have learning disabilities, were effectively imprisoned in their council flat over the weekend of 17 ‑ 19   November 2000, during which time they

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0311DEC007445712

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2014

11 mars 2014

At trial the prosecution relied on the applicant’s police interviews, which had taken place without him having access to a lawyer (either before or during the interviews).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11451

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2016

6 décembre 2016

But the applicants had continued to use their property during the period in question; this had partly but sufficiently compensated for the depreciation of their award.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1005DEC006040709

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2010

5 octobre 2010

From the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192028

Admin. suprême

26 février 2019

26 février 2019

The applicants also complain that they were subjected to forced medical examinations during their detention. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0307DEC007278317

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2019

7 mars 2019

The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during transport were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202681

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2020

16 avril 2020

    Did the applicant’s placement in a glass cabin during the trial amount to degrading treatment proscribed by Article 3 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187556

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2018

11 octobre 2018

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications mainly concern the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicants’ right of access to a lawyer during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614DEC001645113

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2016

14 juin 2016

Additionally, the applicant was working as a cook between 25   February and 1 June 2008 which allowed him to stay outside his cell during the day. 7.

Source officielle