CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0709DEC006467401
9 juillet 2002
He also complains that he was ill-treated during 21 days of solitary confinement. 2.
Page 81 sur 2399
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1023DEC002700495
23 octobre 1997
Further, the pension payments suspended during imprisonment recommence on release at the appropriate updated level.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0109DEC003984698
9 janvier 2001
The police allege that the applicant admitted his involvement in the murder during an interview in the afternoon of 22 October.
TRIBUNAL_UE
ECLI:EU:T:1998:101
14 mai 1998
EC-Treaty - Concept of agreement - Information exchange - Order to desist - Fine - Determination of the amount - Statement of reasons - Mitigating circumstances - Rights of the defence - Cooperation during
ECLI:EU:T:1998:93
(1) of the EC Treaty - Rights of the defence - Proof of participation in collusion - Information exchange - Order to desist - Fine - Statement of reasons - Determination of the amount - Cooperation during
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1109DEC002819003
9 novembre 2006
The court used his testimony received during the preliminary investigation. K. and B. were questioned.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-52234
15 octobre 2001
been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention, on account of the lack of opportunity for the applicants to respond to the conclusions of the representative of the prosecutor’s office during
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55992
Belgian national, and that the Commission declared admissible the complaint that regarding of the lack of opportunity to respond to the conclusions of the representative of the prosecutor’s office during
ECLI:CEDH:001-55994
regard to Interim Resolution DH (98) 133, regarding the fairness of hearings in proceedings before the Cour de Cassation, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 22 April 1998 at its 626th meeting during
ECLI:CEDH:001-52236
been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention on account of the lack of opportunity for the applicant to respond to the conclusions of the representative of the prosecutor’s office during
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6218
22 novembre 2001
He referred to the applicant’s complaint that his son had been beaten by gendarmes during questioning lasting twenty days and that the gendarmes had stubbed their cigarettes out on his son’s body.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705DEC003266610
5 juillet 2011
The first and second applicants, both of whom have learning disabilities, were effectively imprisoned in their council flat over the weekend of 17 ‑ 19 November 2000, during which time they
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0311DEC007445712
11 mars 2014
At trial the prosecution relied on the applicant’s police interviews, which had taken place without him having access to a lawyer (either before or during the interviews).
ECLI:CEDH:002-11451
6 décembre 2016
But the applicants had continued to use their property during the period in question; this had partly but sufficiently compensated for the depreciation of their award.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1005DEC006040709
5 octobre 2010
From the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-192028
26 février 2019
The applicants also complain that they were subjected to forced medical examinations during their detention. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0307DEC007278317
7 mars 2019
The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during transport were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”).
ECLI:CEDH:001-202681
16 avril 2020
Did the applicant’s placement in a glass cabin during the trial amount to degrading treatment proscribed by Article 3 of the Convention?
ECLI:CEDH:001-187556
11 octobre 2018
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications mainly concern the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicants’ right of access to a lawyer during
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614DEC001645113
14 juin 2016
Additionally, the applicant was working as a cook between 25 February and 1 June 2008 which allowed him to stay outside his cell during the day. 7.