subsequently at international level should have been aired, at least in substance, before the competent domestic courts – must be applied with a degree of flexibility and without excessive formalism (see Azinas

an application admissible if it concludes that it should have been declared inadmissible for one of the reasons given in the first three paragraphs of Article 35 of the Convention (see, inter alia , Azinas

Azizi, a lawyer practising in Luxembourg. The Luxemburger Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr M. Thewes, a lawyer practising in Luxembourg. 3.

the national level a remedy enabling the national courts to address, at least in substance, any argument as to an alleged violation of a Convention right, it is that remedy which should be used (see Azinas

to the applicant, the national legal order has been denied the opportunity to address the Convention issue which the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies is intended to give it (see, for example, Azinas

Turke y, nos. 23145/93 and 25091/94, §§ 604 and 605, 13 November 2003, and Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, ECHR   2004 ‑ III). 49.     In Ahmet Sadık v.

could rely on some other ground before the national authorities for challenging an impugned measure, but then lodge an application before the Court on the basis of the Convention argument (see also Azinas

primarily the judicial authorities) to address allegations that a Convention right has been violated and, where appropriate, to afford redress before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see Azinas

Relying on Azinas v. Cyprus ([GC], no.

primarily the judicial authorities) to address the allegations made of violation of a Convention right and, where appropriate, to afford redress before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see Azinas

Franc e [GC], no. 29183/95, §   39, ECHR 1999-I, and Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, §   38, ECHR   2004 ‑ III).

to be made subsequently at international level should have been aired before domestic authorities, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements laid down in domestic law (see Azinas

level should have been aired before those same courts, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see, among other authorities, Azinas

They submitted that Article 35 § 1 was not satisfied where an applicant relied on some other ground for impugning a measure, ignoring a possible Convention argument ( Azinas v.

  48898/99, §   23, ECHR 2003 ‑ V, and Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, §   32, ECHR 2004 ‑ III).

They further informed them that the applicant wanted to apply for asylum and asked for him to be given access to the asylum process ( omogućite pristup postupku azila ).

aired before the appropriate domestic courts, at least in substance, in compliance with the formal requirements and time ‑ limits laid down in domestic law (see, among many other authorities, Azinas

Franc e [GC], no. 29183/95, §   39, ECHR 1999-I, and Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, §   38, ECHR   2004 ‑ III).

level should have been aired before those same courts, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law (see, among many other authorities, Azinas