According to the report on his questioning, he was twice advised by the investigating judge of his right to remain silent and to hire a lawyer of his own choosing, who could be present during the questioning

The Government remained silent in respect of these specific allegations by the applicant and did not submit any relevant documentary evidence refuting them.

They submitted that although Article R. 422-53 of the Environment Code could have been regarded as unlawful on the date in 2018 when, noting that the law was silent, the Conseil d’État had interpreted

She had left the classroom and, seeing that all was silent in the corridor, she had returned to the classroom.

According to the examination report of the applicant in the status of an accused, he chose to remain silent.

The first applicant asked them what they wanted but they told her to keep silent. They did not explain anything to the applicants and did not produce any papers.

The court was also silent as to the legality of the police intrusion into the applicant’s flat.

Kh. also claimed that she had been offered money if she was silent about what she had seen on the night of the murder.

The presiding judge of the Court of Appeal had therefore instructed M. before the start of his testimony that he could invoke his right to remain silent in respect of each separate question.

The local police, otherwise very prompt when it comes to informing [the public] even of much lesser offences, simply kept silent ... [about the incident] ...

    On 11 February 1996 the applicant was brought before the investigating judge of the Bjelovar County Court ( Županijski sud u Bjelovaru ) for questioning, but he decided to remain silent because

The applicant signed the arrest record, noting that he had been informed of his constitutional rights as an accused, including the right to remain silent and to be assisted by counsel.

He also told the psychologist that the mother had also told him that “if I and my brother say nothing, and are silent, then our father [the applicant] would be released from prison, and our mother would

    The representative of the Ministry of Internal Affairs was silent as to the applicant’s particular complaint on her ill-treatment by the police. 18.

When O.V. and others tried to explain that he had been wounded while collecting firewood, the servicemen threatened them with their submachine guns and ordered them to remain silent. 16.

He refused to give any further evidence, relying on his constitutional right to remain silent. 14.

    At the same time on the same day the applicant also signed a record confirming that he had been informed about his rights as a suspect, in particular the right to remain silent and to consult

And all this was done with the silent approval of prison officers who knew which cell they had put the claimant in, and who knew or ought to have known about everything that happened to him.” 41 .

Several new procedures aiming at simplifying and accelerating proceedings were introduced, in particular a “silent procedure” ( milczące załatwienie sprawy ) and a simplified procedure (Article 35 § 3