CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211JUD001998806
11 décembre 2012
The remedy must be “effective” in practice as well as in law (see Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 67, ECHR 2000 ‑ V). 44.
Page 80 sur 84
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0605JUD007444114
5 juin 2018
Moldova (no. 47203/06, § 50, 30 November 2010), and Rotaru v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0125JUD003709697
25 janvier 2005
domestic law, but also refers to the quality of the law in question, requiring that it should be accessible to the person concerned and foreseeable as to its effects (see, among many other authorities, Rotaru
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0111JUD000656203
11 janvier 2007
25390/94, § 34, ECHR 1999 ‑ III; Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 55, ECHR 2000 ‑ V; Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004 ‑ I).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417JUD006017909
17 avril 2012
Moldova (no. 47203/06, § 50, 30 November 2010), and in Rotaru v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0131JUD003840697
31 janvier 2008
France , judgment of 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, p. 846, § 36, and Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 35, ECHR 2000-V).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1112JUD000649214
12 novembre 2024
xa0; Dumitru ODAJIU 1960 Chișinău Moldovan Stelian ODAJIU 1982 Chișinău Moldovan Gheorghe NEDOV Eduard MARKOV Ilie ROTARU
Chambre des Terres
64f2d04c5aeec3d969238976
24 août 2023
Puis, la route se termine sur une paroi rocheuse d'un côté et par un précipice de l'autre. En redescendant sur la route territoriale, se trouve l'habitation de Monsieur [VO] [T].
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918JUD000628206
18 septembre 2012
Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI; and Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 35, ECHR 2000-V).
5ème Chambre
DTA_2003574_20221024
24 octobre 2022
Elle sera en revanche nettement visible sur la falaise depuis la plage à proximité de l'éperon rocheux fortifié de la pointe de Rochebonne à l'intérieur d'un site inscrit.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1202JUD004397809
2 décembre 2014
should have some basis in domestic law, but also refers to the quality of the law in question, requiring that it should be accessible to the person concerned and foreseeable as to its effects (see Rotaru
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1022JUD007978313
22 octobre 2020
The storing and disclosure of information relating to an individual’s private life falls within the scope of Article 8 § 1 (see, for example, Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0717JUD002051103
17 juillet 2008
The processing of information relating to an individual’s private life comes within the scope of Article 8 § 1 (see Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502DEC006296414
2 mai 2017
in question, requiring that it should be compatible with the rule of law and accessible to the person concerned, who must be able to foresee its consequences for him (see, among other authorities, Rotaru
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619DEC000863011
19 juin 2018
This is all the more pertinent where such information concerns a person’s distant past ( Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 43, ECHR 2000 ‑ V). 61.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0215JUD005671609
15 février 2011
need be with appropriate legal advice, to foresee the consequences of the domestic law for him, and fourth, the domestic law must be compatible with the rule of law (see, among many other authorities, Rotaru
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1005DEC000042007
5 octobre 2010
It further considered relevant in this connection whether or not a particular individual was targeted by the monitoring measure (compare Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0430JUD006759314
30 avril 2025
Vladimir 1963 Start of enforcement proceedings 2005 End of enforcement proceedings 11/11/2016 REABININA Liudmila 1928 No information available No information available ROTARU
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1126JUD003438303
26 novembre 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0418JUD001952209
18 avril 2013
indicate with sufficient clarity the scope of discretion conferred on the competent authorities and the manner of its exercise (see Malone v. the United Kingdom , 2 August 1984, §§ 66-68, Series A no. 82; Rotaru