the statutory limitation period was interrupted when he instituted civil proceedings within three months from the date of the second-instance decision dismissing the charges against the defendant is legally

    Moreover, the applicant complains that he was not presumed innocent as he was convicted even though the estate’s representative was not legally competent to institute criminal proceedings

Charter of      Fundamental Rights and Freedoms, ownership may not be      misused to the detriment of the rights of others or against      legally

          The applicant further complains that she has not had access to the courts as she has been unable to obtain legal aid and has been legally advised of the

His request was ultimately rejected by the Russian migration authorities, and then by the courts, mainly on the grounds that:   the applicant had been allowed to leave Turkmenistan legally and without

the industrial plant permission requested on 24 April 1989 had not yet been finally decided upon and, moreover, would only have an effect for the future, the City Council's decision of 1977 was still legally

On the merits, the court held that the agreements between the company and the trade unions were not legally binding, so that the applicant could not claim a right to return to work on a given date.

He noted that the procedures before the Privy Council are complicated and do not readily lend themselves to presentation by a litigant who is not legally aided and added, “Furthermore, in this appeal there

Nor was the case straightforward legally. Extensive legal and procedural issues had to be resolved before the trial judge was in a position to decide the main issue.

   None of the applicants was legally represented at the committal hearing.   10.

He had been tried in public before two independent judges; he had been present throughout the proceedings and was legally represented; he had been acquitted of some of the charges in accordance with the

The applicant, legally represented by advocate L., lodged an appeal with the Supreme Court. By a judgment of 4 May 2011 the Supreme Court in substance upheld the lower courts’ judgments.

  In 2001 she lodged a civil action against her child’s putative father, requesting that the latter’s paternal link be confirmed legally and that the respondent be ordered to give his name to the

Some of the applicants were legally represented. The legal representatives involved were Mr A. Atanasov, Ms   G. Chernicherska, Ms S. Stefanova. Mr M. Ekimdzhiev, Ms   Z.

65192/11 Judgment 26.6.2014 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Refusal to grant legal recognition in France to parent-child relationships that had been legally

65941/11 Judgment 26.6.2014 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Refusal to grant legal recognition in France to parent-child relationships that had been legally

The applicants are not legally represented before the Court. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. A.

Consequently, the aforementioned land could not be identified with Romania which was an entity defined both legally and from a political-administrative perspective.

The text read as follows: “On 27 September in the village Jadwigów a legally valid village meeting took place, during which residents of the village decided by vast majority to appoint me in charge of