He pointed out that the applicant had no source of income owing to the death of the head of the family, and had not paid him any fees.

It also observed that the legal assistance contracts did not specify the fees payable to the applicant, while the amounts claimed by him under that head were unreasonably high.

    Was Article 6 §   1 of the Convention under its criminal head applicable to the proceedings in the present case?

page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Published on 13 June 2022   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 14368/22 Heba

domestic judgment Action to be performed 1. 10789/18 12/02/2018 Petro Ivanovych YAKOVETS 1949 Uzhgorod Kyiv Circuit Administrative Court, 16 July 2013 Reinstatement of the applicant in the post of a Deputy Head

    Was Article   6 §   1 of the Convention under its civil head applicable to the proceedings in the present case?

    Was Article   6 §   1 of the Convention under its civil head applicable to the proceedings in the present case (cf. Oktay Alkan v. Türkiye , no.

non-applicability of Article   6: dismissed given that interference with witnesses was a criminal offence under domestic legislation and Article 6§ 1 was therefore applicable under its criminal head

    Was Article 6 § 1 of the Convention under its civil head applicable to the proceedings in the present case?   2.

failure to effectively investigate and bring to justice the perpetrators (two private individuals, X and Y) of an attack on the applicant’s physical integrity that had caused her several injuries on the head

    Was Article 6 § 1 of the Convention under its civil or criminal head applicable to the proceedings in the present case in so far as the lifting of the applicant’s immunity is concerned?

Moreover, it was clear that the sum claimed by the applicants before the Court under the head of non-pecuniary damage (EUR 6,000 each) was disproportionate to the sum awarded in the domestic proceedings

On 22 October 2012 the Sovetskiy District Court of Omsk convicted the head of the hospital surgery unit of criminal negligence entailing the victim’s death (Article 293 § 2 of the Criminal Code) and sentenced

had been made out, dismissed the applicant’s appeal on the ground that it could not find either collective liability on the part of the prison’s postal service or criminal liability on the part of the head

Communicated under the head of the positive obligations arising from Articles 2 and 8 (right to respect for private and family life and the home) and Articles 6 (access to a court) and 13 of the Convention

    Was Article 6 § 1 of the Convention under its civil or criminal head applicable to the proceedings in the present case in so far as the lifting of the applicant’s immunity is concerned?

At the material time, in 2020, the first applicant was head of the Federal Administration of Civil Protection and the second applicant was the Prime Minister of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Was Article   6 §   1 of the Convention under its civil head applicable to the proceedings in the present case?

    Was Article   6 §   1 of the Convention under its civil head applicable to the judicial proceedings in the present case?

    Was Article   6 §   1 of the Convention under its criminal head applicable to the proceedings in the present case?   2.