CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 17 mars 2021

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 250 April 2021 Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and others v. Switzerland (communicated case) - 53600/20   Article 34 Victim Victim status of an association and individuals in the area of global warming: communicated Article 2 Positive obligations Alleged failings in the prevention of global warming: communicated Article 6 Administrative proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Civil rights and obligations Inadmissibility of legal actions concerning global warming on grounds of insufficient individual and direct interest: communicated Article 8 Positive obligations Alleged failings in the prevention of global warming: communicated Article 13 Effective remedy Lack of remedy in the prevention of global warming: communicated The applicants are, on the one hand, an association under Swiss law for the prevention of climate change and of which hundreds of elderly women are members, and on the other, four elderly women (between 78 and 89) who complain of health problems which undermine their living conditions during heatwaves. Since 2016 they have made unsuccessful requests to a number of authorities urging them to make up for their failure to take the necessary measures to meet the 2030 goal set by the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change (COP21), in particular to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels. The Federal Court dismissed as inadmissible a number of applications by the applicants. Even invoking the concept of “potential victim”, the applicants were still required to demonstrate that they were sufficiently affected by the alleged failings. As it had not been established that they had sufficient standing, the court was of the view that their claims were tantamount to an actio popularis . Communicated under the head of the positive obligations arising from Articles 2 and 8 (right to respect for private and family life and the home) and Articles 6 (access to a court) and 13 of the Convention – with questions about their applicability and the victim status of the applicants, a legal entity and a number of individuals. (See also Duarte Agostinho and Others v. Portugal and 32 other States , 39371/20, communicated in November 2020, Legal Summary )   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes