Iceland , no. 60669/00, ECHR 2004-IX; and the Chamber judgment of 20 June 2002 in Azinas v.

remedy available to the applicant, the national legal order has been denied the opportunity to address the Convention issue which the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies is intended to give it (see Azinas

national courts of the High Contracting States of the opportunity which Article 35 § 1 of the Convention offers them of addressing and so preventing or putting right the breaches alleged against them (see Azinas

at national level a remedy enabling the national courts to address, at least in substance, any argument as to an alleged violation of a Convention right, it is that remedy which should be used (see Azinas

allow the national authorities to address allegations concerning a violation of a Convention right and, where appropriate, to afford redress before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see Azinas

Franc e [GC], no. 29183/95, § 39, ECHR 1999-I, and Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, ECHR   2004 ‑ III).

Convention argument, could rely on some other ground for challenging an impugned measure at national level, and then apply to the Court on the basis of the Convention argument (see, among other authorities, Azinas

at national level a remedy enabling the national courts to address, at least in substance, any argument as to an alleged violation of a Convention right, it is that remedy which should be used (see Azinas

Greece , 15 November 1996, § 33, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 ‑ V; and Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no.   56679/00, §§ 40-41, ECHR 2004 ‑ III). 37.

to be made subsequently at international level should have been aired before domestic authorities, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements laid down in domestic law (see Azinas

Franc e [GC], no. 29183/95, §   39, ECHR 1999-I, and Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, §   38, ECHR   2004 ‑ III).

to declare an application admissible where it concludes that it should have been declared inadmissible for one of the reasons given in the first three paragraphs of Article 35 of the Convention (see Azinas

at national level a remedy enabling the national courts to address, at least in substance, any argument as to an alleged violation of a Convention right, it is that remedy which should be used (see Azinas

France [GC], no. 29183/95 , §   37, ECHR 1999-I; Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00 , § 38, ECHR 2004 ‑ III; and Vučković and Others v.

remedy available to the applicant, the national legal order has been denied the opportunity to address the Convention issue which the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies is intended to give it (see Azinas

have been aired before the appropriate domestic courts, at least in substance, in compliance with the formal requirements and time‑limits laid down in domestic law (see, among many other authorities, Azinas

It is the Convention complaint which must have been aired before the domestic authorities, at least in substance (see, among other authorities, Azinas v.

Furthermore, the exhaustion rule requires that the complaints intended to be made at the international level should first be aired in substance before the domestic courts (see Azinas v.

primarily the judicial authorities) to address allegations made of a violation of a Convention right and, where appropriate, to afford redress before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see Azinas