On 7 April 1998 the Wrocław Court of Appeal upheld the refusal of 30 March 1998 to stay the proceedings.

    Between July 2004 and April 2006 the Zhytomyr Regional Bailiffs’ Service several times terminated and resumed the enforcement proceedings in respect of the judgment of 17   April 2003

    On 9 April 2015 the prosecutor lodged an appeal against the sentence of 3 April 2015 with the registry of the Chișinău Court of Appeal. 6.

On 15 April 2011 the applicants met with their representative for the first time.

    On an unspecified date the applicants’ claims based on the judgment of 18 April 2008 were formally recognised. 13.

On 21 April 1997 the Social Court dismissed the applicant’s action regarding child benefits between July 1995 and 7 April 1997.

The applicant lodged an application for supervisory review of the ruling of 7 April 2009 with the Supreme Court of Russia (see below).

Ils prennent acte du fait que la société April est gestionnaire, l'assureur étant la société Axera Prévoyance.

On 30 April 2004 investigator T. dismissed the applicant’s request for exclusion of his confession statement and the record of his first interview on 19 April 2004 from evidence, having noted that the

    On 3 April 1996 the Klaipėda Regional Court quashed the judgment of the District Court.

From noon to 1 p.m. on 22 April 2005 the applicant was questioned in the lawyer’s presence and signed a typed summary of his account of the events of 20 April 2005, similar to that given on 21 April 2005

Russia , no. 60333/00, 20 April 2010). 68.

As shown by the case files, the decision of 3   April 2009 was served on the applicant on 16   April 2009. 15 .

    On 24 April 2005 Mr Tokarev appealed against the court decision of 21 April 2005.

    The applicant reaffirmed that he had suffered police abuse on 18   April 2011.

On the same day the court stayed the proceedings until 5 April 2001.

On 10   April   1998 the court held a hearing and ordered that expert evidence be obtained.

Subsequently, the applicant further applied for the annulment of another order but that appeal was dismissed by the Conseil d’Etat on 5 April 2002.

He claimed that up until 15 April 2003 he had shared his cell with five other inmates, each having an average personal space of 2.70   m 2 , and, from 15   April to 20   October 2003, with