CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0207JUD004066008
7 février 2012
out of the public eye and, moreover, succeeds in proving it (which can be difficult).
Page 80 sur 88
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210JUD005198708
10 février 2015
Given that the impugned legislation remains unamended, the Court cannot but conclude that, as in Hirst (no. 2) , Greens and M.T. and Firth and Others , and for the same reasons, there has
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0713JUD004814510
13 juillet 2021
Therefore, these aspects of conditions of detention in the three facilities can be considered to amount to a continuing situation.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0702DEC002917895
2 juillet 2002
Criminal prosecution On or about 23 June 1999, charges were brought against: – William Alfred Stobie for the murder of Patrick Finucane; – Mark Barr, Paul Alexander Givens and
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122JUD000222610
22 novembre 2011
In the light of the foregoing, the Court cannot but follow the domestic courts which have taken positive action also in respect of Plot 3 (see paragraphs 21 and 22 above).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0515JUD000717803
15 mai 2008
The applicants are: Mr Mikhail Vladimirovich Dedovskiy born in 1969, Mr Alexandr Mikhaylovich Matrosov born in 1968, Mr Viktor Viktorovich Vidin born in 1978, Mr Stanislav Lvovich Bukhman
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1209JUD001900591
9 décembre 1994
Such reasoning cannot automatically be applied to disputes concerning the obligation to pay contributions under social-security schemes.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD005324014
12 décembre 2017
The cases of Alexandrou and Eugenia Michaelidou Developments and Michael Tymvios do not raise any issue in respect of the payment of just satisfaction, as the applicants concluded friendly settlements
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0619JUD005198019
19 juin 2025
was removed due to participation in a fight; no referral was made for housing, and he was left homeless; 02/12/19 Koressia Border Guard Police Station (protective custody); 17/12/19 - 02/01/20 - Alexandria
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1214JUD002643112
14 décembre 2017
The applicants’ details can be found in the Annex. A. The background to the case 1. Ms Francesca Orlandi and Ms Elisabetta Mortagna 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD003804704
18 octobre 2011
First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Nina Vajić, President, Anatoly Kovler, Peer Lorenzen, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Julia Laffranque, Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103DEC003891405
3 novembre 2011
In this connection the Court cannot but note the higher amount of compensation awarded in cases decided after this date compared to the awards made earlier.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0227JUD003197411
27 février 2014
European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President, Julia Laffranque, Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0213JUD003137910
13 février 2014
European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Julia Laffranque, Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD000554805
13 novembre 2014
xa0; Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President, Elisabeth Steiner, Khanlar Hajiyev, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Julia Laffranque, Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0326JUD001123911
26 mars 2015
It cannot therefore be said that the obligation of the plaintiffs to seek settlement of the claim with the State Attorney’s Office before lodging an action against the Republic of Croatia represents an
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD000415704
27 juin 2013
Following the preliminary hearing the trial court can decide, among other things, to return the case file to the prosecutor, to suspend the examination of the case, or to terminate criminal proceedings
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC004298709
22 janvier 2013
Expulsion can also be challenged before an administrative court (section 16(1)). 40.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0327JUD001762803
27 mars 2012
The maximum permitted period of detention “pending the investigation” is two months but it can be extended up to eighteen months in “exceptional circumstances”.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0227JUD000095203
27 février 2007
In particular, it considers that the reasons for the belated enforcement advanced by the Government cannot justify a delay of more than three years, considering that the debtor in the present case was