CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 753 résultats pour « Alexandre Cano »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0207JUD004066008

Admin. suprême

7 février 2012

7 février 2012

out of the public eye and, moreover, succeeds in proving it (which can be difficult).

Page 80 sur 88

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210JUD005198708

Admin. suprême

10 février 2015

10 février 2015

    Given that the impugned legislation remains unamended, the Court cannot but conclude that, as in Hirst (no. 2) , Greens and M.T. and Firth and Others , and for the same reasons, there has

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0713JUD004814510

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2021

13 juillet 2021

Therefore, these aspects of conditions of detention in the three facilities can be considered to amount to a continuing situation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0702DEC002917895

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 2002

2 juillet 2002

Criminal prosecution On or about 23 June 1999, charges were brought against: –     William Alfred Stobie for the murder of Patrick Finucane; –     Mark Barr, Paul Alexander Givens and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122JUD000222610

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2011

22 novembre 2011

In the light of the foregoing, the Court cannot but follow the domestic courts which have taken positive action also in respect of Plot 3 (see paragraphs 21 and 22 above).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0515JUD000717803

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2008

15 mai 2008

    The applicants are: Mr Mikhail Vladimirovich Dedovskiy born in 1969, Mr Alexandr Mikhaylovich Matrosov born in 1968, Mr Viktor Viktorovich Vidin born in 1978, Mr Stanislav Lvovich Bukhman

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1209JUD001900591

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 1994

9 décembre 1994

Such reasoning cannot automatically be applied to disputes concerning the obligation to pay contributions under social-security schemes.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD005324014

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2017

12 décembre 2017

The cases of Alexandrou and Eugenia Michaelidou Developments and Michael Tymvios do not raise any issue in respect of the payment of just satisfaction, as the applicants concluded friendly settlements

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0619JUD005198019

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2025

19 juin 2025

was removed due to participation in a fight; no referral was made for housing, and he was left homeless; 02/12/19 Koressia Border Guard Police Station (protective custody); 17/12/19 - 02/01/20 - Alexandria

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1214JUD002643112

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2017

14 décembre 2017

    The applicants’ details can be found in the Annex. A.     The background to the case 1.     Ms Francesca Orlandi and Ms Elisabetta Mortagna 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD003804704

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2011

18 octobre 2011

First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Peer Lorenzen,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103DEC003891405

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2011

3 novembre 2011

In this connection the Court cannot but note the higher amount of compensation awarded in cases decided after this date compared to the awards made earlier.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0227JUD003197411

Admin. suprême

27 février 2014

27 février 2014

European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0213JUD003137910

Admin. suprême

13 février 2014

13 février 2014

European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD000554805

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2014

13 novembre 2014

xa0; Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0326JUD001123911

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2015

26 mars 2015

It cannot therefore be said that the obligation of the plaintiffs to seek settlement of the claim with the State Attorney’s Office before lodging an action against the Republic of Croatia represents an

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD000415704

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2013

27 juin 2013

Following the preliminary hearing the trial court can decide, among other things, to return the case file to the prosecutor, to suspend the examination of the case, or to terminate criminal proceedings

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC004298709

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

Expulsion can also be challenged before an administrative court (section 16(1)). 40.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0327JUD001762803

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2012

27 mars 2012

The maximum permitted period of detention “pending the investigation” is two months but it can be extended up to eighteen months in “exceptional circumstances”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0227JUD000095203

Admin. suprême

27 février 2007

27 février 2007

In particular, it considers that the reasons for the belated enforcement advanced by the Government cannot justify a delay of more than three years, considering that the debtor in the present case was

Source officielle