validité de l'accord du 5 janvier 2005, dans la mesure où le syndicat défendeur en sollicitait l'annulation, quand cette demande ne ressortait pas de sa compétence, le tribunal d'instance a violé l'article

    Articles 43, 47, 51 (2), 62 (a) and 96 of the Foreign Nationals Act of 16 December 2005, as in force at the relevant time, read as follows: Art. 43 Spouses and children of persons with a

SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE, PRIS DE LA VIOLATION DES ARTICLES L 122-14-3 ET SUIVANTS DU CODE DU TRAVAIL, 51 DE LA CONVENTION COLLECTIVE NATIONALE DES COMMERCES DE GROS DU 1ER JUILLET 1970, 7 DE LA LOI DU 20 AVRIL

   Holds that there has been no violation of Article 5 § 3 (art. 5-3);   2.    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (art. 6-1);   3.

. 2.

  Signed: Rolv RYSSDAL         President   Signed: Marc-André Eissen         Registrar   In accordance with Article

  471/1997”, see paragraph 52 below); and (iii)   under Article 55 § 2 (1) of Decree no.   633/1972 (see paragraph 43 below) and Article 39 § 2 (c) of Decree no.

Article 48.

Makarczyk (Rule 51 § 2 (a) and (b)).

He considered, moreover, that there had been a breach of Article 6 § 2 and Article 8 on account of the fact that İzmir police headquarters had informed his father of his arrest and the reasons for it.

committed and prohibits collective penalties, and all measures of intimidation, pillage and reprisals against protected persons and their property. – Article 51 § 2 of the Protocol Additional to the [

Article 14 (art. 14+8) - and Articles 3 and 7 (art. 3, art. 7). 2.

In finding no violation of Article 11 of the Convention, the Court gave, inter alia , the following reasons: “51.

However, as the criminal investigations were still pending, the period of prescription “could be prolonged”, pursuant to the provisions of Article 51 (2) of that Act. 49.

   Holds by twelve votes to six that Article 6 § 1 (art. 6-1) applied in the instant case;   2.

  Holds that no violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1) has been established;   2.

Making an equitable assessment in accordance with Article 50 (art. 50), it awards the applicant 3,000 Deutschmarks under this head. 51.

Turkey [2] , The European Court of Human Rights, sitting, in accordance with Rule   51 of Rules of Court A [3] , as a Grand Chamber composed of the following judges:   Mr   R.

committed and prohibits collective penalties and all measures of intimidation, pillage and reprisals against protected persons and their property. –     Article 51 § 2 of the [First] Protocol