CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

97 931 résultats pour « article 48-2 »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-163

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 1998

3 septembre 1998

Italy [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the

Source officielle
CC

cr

Paris une instance civile en diffamationc/Francis Y

6079a8e59ba5988459c4f2a6

Cassation

28 novembre 2006

28 novembre 2006

un membre du ministère (article 31, alinéa 1er) pour la plainte ; qu'elle soutient qu'il en résulte un concours de qualification prohibé par l'article 53 de la loi sur la presse devant entraîner

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0621JUD004881799

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2005

21 juin 2005

    Article 48(2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay. 16.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1210DEC004620999

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2002

10 décembre 2002

    Relevant domestic law and practice Article 48 (2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0427DEC003879897

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2000

27 avril 2000

  Relevant domestic law and practice     Article 48 (2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia, that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unreasonable delay

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-154

Admin. suprême

1 septembre 1998

1 septembre 1998

Austria (no. 2) [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-168

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 1998

3 septembre 1998

Italy (no. 2) [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-176

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 1998

6 octobre 1998

Italy (no. 2) [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142

Admin. suprême

3 juin 1998

3 juin 1998

Switzerland [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-153

Admin. suprême

7 août 1998

7 août 1998

Finland [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155

Admin. suprême

1 septembre 1998

1 septembre 1998

Austria (no. 3) [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 1997

3 octobre 1997

Austria [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-150

Admin. suprême

7 août 1998

7 août 1998

Sweden [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188

Admin. suprême

30 octobre 1998

30 octobre 1998

Italy [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 1998

6 octobre 1998

Portugal [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-167

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 1998

3 septembre 1998

Italy [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-173

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 1998

5 octobre 1998

Austria [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 1998

6 octobre 1998

Italy [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-180

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 1998

6 octobre 1998

Italy [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 1998

6 octobre 1998

Italy [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the

Source officielle

Page 8 sur 4897

← PrécédentSuivant →