It held that the applicant could have instituted proceedings under Article 131 § 4 of the Commercial Code claiming just satisfaction caused by an unlawful decision of a general meeting.

To secure the loan, a pledge agreement was concluded over 610,149 dematerialised, common, registered shares in IASO S.A., owned by the applicant.

In accordance with its newly introduced Article 220p, a general meeting of a joint stock company was empowered to decide to wind up the company and transfer all its assets to a shareholder who owned shares

The applicant is an owner of a one-third share in a hotel in Berdiansk (Azov Sea region). Between 2006 and 2008 he leased this share to a certain B., who provided hotel services.

The Applicant’s assets in 2012 and the donation of shares The applicant owned shares in Emperia Holding S.A.

Under section 163a(1) the issue price of a share is the sum at which a   company issued shares. The issue price cannot be lower than the nominal value of a share.

the applicants had obtained profit by reselling those shares.

However, by that time the company in which the share belonged had been liquidated – as of July 1997 – and the share had lost its value altogether. 8.

She received no response. 21.

    On 18 August 1998 the applicant applied to the mayor of Königstetten for a building permit for a shed, to be used as a shelter for sheep and goats in summer and beehives in winter.

resolutions depriving them of their shares in the respective companies.

Law – Article 1 of Protocol No. 1: (a) Existence of “possessions” and interference with the right to property – The shares could be considered a “possession” within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol

1983 ; que la société Shell s'est portée caution du prêt contracté par M.

They found that the minutes had been signed by Mr   Tarlev and an engineer employed by the company, Eugenia G., who gave evidence that she had not attended any meeting and had signed at the request

She was charged with participation in an unauthorized meeting under Article 20.2 § 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO).

Application No. 2217/64   As mentioned above, Z inherited a part of the shares in the company and retained, furthermore, an interest in the shares of her children.

At that time, the applicant association became the main shareholder of the company, holding 70% of the shares. 5.

    He argued firstly that the shares in Yaşarbank, which he had bought on the stock exchange, had constituted possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

FINANCIERE ET ECONOMIQUE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu, selon l'arrêt déféré (Paris, 28 avril 2000), qu'à l'issue de relations ayant duré plusieurs années, la société X... a assigné la société Shell