Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1120DEC003569823
20 novembre 2025
20 novembre 2025
’s failure to provide reasons for its omission to refer were communicated to the German Government (“the Government”).
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218103
1 juin 2022
1 juin 2022
Poland 01/09/2021 Jerzy SZEWCZUK 1962 Zamość Polish Sebastian KOTUŁA On 9/05/2018 the Lublin Regional Court convicted the applicant and sentenced him to one year and eight months’ imprisonment for
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-146042
7 juillet 2014
7 juillet 2014
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Having regard to the cumulative effect of the “dangerous detainee” regime imposed on the applicant from 27 November 2004 to 17 June 2010, has he been subjected to treatment contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1009JUD001502816
9 octobre 2025
9 octobre 2025
undertaking by the Government to pay him 2,492,000 Armenian drams to cover any and all pecuniary damage, plus any taxes that might be applicable to the applicant on that amount.
Source officiellePRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3115728-3467305
6 mai 2010
6 mai 2010
He was instructed to hand his licence in to the authorities.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113DEC003950704
13 novembre 2008
13 novembre 2008
the list of cases and the applicant’s reply to that declaration, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Sebastian Gustaw, is a Polish national who was born in
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1106DEC003175712
6 novembre 2018
6 novembre 2018
Walak and PLN 43,040 to A.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1121DEC001162522
21 novembre 2024
21 novembre 2024
application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay him the amounts detailed in the appended table.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1008DEC004266821
8 octobre 2024
8 octobre 2024
of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay to each of the applicants 10,000 euros to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0215DEC003955120
15 février 2024
15 février 2024
application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay him the amount detailed in the appended table.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0227DEC000662824
27 février 2025
27 février 2025
to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay him the amount detailed in the appended table.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-50225
9 juin 1999
9 juin 1999
as “the Convention”), Having regard to the report drawn up on 27 October 1998 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0404DEC004417316
4 avril 2024
4 avril 2024
Serbia The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 4 April 2024 as a Committee composed of: Anne Louise Bormann , President , Branko Lubarda, Sebastian
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-176148
11 juillet 2017
11 juillet 2017
According to the applicant’s submissions, during the body searches he had had to strip naked in the presence of a warden and another prison officer.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1121DEC001387820
21 novembre 2024
21 novembre 2024
conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1121DEC004893722
21 novembre 2024
21 novembre 2024
The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1121DEC000991521
21 novembre 2024
21 novembre 2024
an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicant, allowing him to have the violation of the Convention acknowledged, either explicitly or in substance, and to receive adequate and
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0418DEC005677721
18 avril 2024
18 avril 2024
The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1017DEC001931517
17 octobre 2024
17 octobre 2024
the Bihor County Court, were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”).
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-173328
5 avril 2017
5 avril 2017
On 6 March 2010 the applicant was arrested in France under a European arrest warrant and sent to Spain, where he was remanded in custody for allegedly, along with other individuals, belonging to the terrorist
Source officiellePage 8 sur 44