CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1129DEC005284899
29 novembre 2001
THE LAW 1. The applicant complains that he has been subjected to psychological torture.
Page 8 sur 46
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324JUD004145305
24 mars 2009
RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 8.
cr
613725adcd5801467741fb48
8 octobre 1996
Yee); que le docteur X... recevait, courant février 1990, la visite de Félix Lai qui lui indiquait que les fonds étaient bien arrivés à "leur destinataire" et qu'il ne devait plus s'inquiéter; que Félix
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1202JUD000308206
2 décembre 2014
[inaudible], yes? O.V. Yes, yes. A. [leaves] Who has the seal? ( talks to colleagues ) O.V.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1129DEC005246499
Bournous, a lawyer practising in Athens, and Mr J. Berasategi, a lawyer practising in Brussels. A.
1ère Chambre
DTA_2300161_20240116
16 janvier 2024
" ; 2°) de mettre à la charge de la Polynésie française et de la Sarl " Bora Yes " la somme respective de 150 000 F CFP au titre de l'article L. 761-1 du code de justice administrative ; Ils soutiennent
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD002345903
7 juillet 2011
Since no law has yet been adopted in Armenia on alternative service, you must submit to the current law and serve in the Armenian army.” 17.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3195088-3556010
6 juillet 2010
This lack of reasoning stemmed from the very wording of Law no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002220513
24 juillet 2014
702(1) of the Law].
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0628DEC006117700
28 juin 2005
Relevant domestic law and practice [1] On 17 September 2004 the Law of 17 June 2004 on complaints about a breach of the right to a trial within a reasonable time ( Ustawa o skardze na naruszenie
DTA_2200076_20221018
18 octobre 2022
Le Bon représentant la Polynésie française, et celles de Me Quinquis pour la Sarl Bora Yes. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1122DEC002848103
22 novembre 2005
On 31 May 2004 the applicant’s lawyer was notified that on 7 June 2004 she would be given access to the file. B. Relevant domestic law and practice 1.
Pôle 5 - Chambre 6
60325e312f024d93505df37a
16 février 2018
Grosses délivréesRÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE aux parties le :AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS Pôle 5 - Chambre 6 ARRET DU 16 FEVRIER 2018 (n° , 19 pages) Numéro d'inscription au
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0329JUD005008406
29 mars 2011
Several weeks later, in an order of 18 December 1990 [8] , the urgent-applications judge held that Article 584 of the Judicial Code in itself constituted a “law” within the meaning of Article 10 of the
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403DEC002781409
3 avril 2012
Sulyok, a lawyer practising in Budapest. The Hungarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr L. Höltzl, Agent, Ministry of Public Administration and Justice.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014JUD000790905
14 octobre 2008
Szemes, a lawyer practising in Budapest. The Hungarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr. L. Höltzl, Agent, Ministry of Justice and Law Enforcement. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0717JUD000907705
17 juillet 2008
Cech, a lawyer practising in Budapest. The Hungarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr L. Höltzl, Agent, Ministry of Justice and Law Enforcement. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0828JUD000406207
28 août 2012
RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 22. Law No. 4616, in so far as relevant, provides as follows: “4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD002226103
8 janvier 2009
RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE 13. The relevant domestic law and practice are set out in the Çiçek and Öztemel and Others v. Turkey judgment of 3 May 2007 (nos.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0614JUD000995804
14 juin 2011
On the latter point, the court considered that the threat presented by the applicant could not be assessed only by reference to formal provisions of the criminal law qualifying the offence of which the