[D] [V] (Me François DEFENDINI) C/ société CIC [7] (la SCP CABINET ROSENFELD & ASSOCIES) Rapport oral préalablement fait DÉBATS : A l'audience Publique du 22 Février 2024 COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL

Par des mémoires en défense enregistrés les 26 septembre et 2 décembre 2024, l'office public de l'habitat 13 Habitat, représenté par Me Defendini, conclut au rejet de la requête, à ce qu'une somme de

PNM immatriculée au RCS de [Localité 3] sous le n°542 234 457 [Adresse 3] [Localité 4] représentée par Me Geneviève FOLZER, avocat au barreau de STRASBOURG, substituée par Me Claire DERRENDINGER, avocat

Service contentieux [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] Comparante en la personne de Mme [I] [G], munie d'un pouvoir INTIME : Monsieur [K] [W] [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] Représenté par Me Claire DERRENDINGER

n° 08-01678 APPELANTE Madame [X] [E] [Adresse 5] [Localité 4] comparante en personne, assistée de Me Arnaud OLIVIER, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : A 476 substitué par Me Denis DERRENDINGER

(publishing company) demanding that each of them publishes an apology for breaching her personal rights.

It was for the courts to ensure that a trial was fair and, accordingly, that counsel who attended trial for the apparent purpose of defending the accused in his absence was given the opportunity to do

His case concerns the difference in treatment as regards the early release of prisoners depending on the length of the sentence originally imposed.

The defending party lodged an appeal. 13.     On 16 April 1998 the Ljubljana Higher Labour Court rejected the appeal and upheld the first-instance judgment.

    On 11 July 2008, the applicant made an application to the Ministry of Defence and requested that the status of martyr – that is to say someone who died defending their country ( şehit ) –

They alleged that they were ill-treated by the police at the time of their arrest and before being brought before a court, a period which lasted from two to six days depending on the individual case.

Furthermore, does the domestic law impose the national courts to make an assessment of the proportionality of the measure depending on the circumstances of each case?   4.

The Court reiterates that whenever an applicant omits, contrary to Rule   44C § 1 of the Rules of Court, to divulge relevant information of his or her own motion, depending on the particular circumstances

    Depending on the answer to question 1,   was the length of the proceedings in the present case in compliance with the “reasonable time” requirement set out in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention

The third-party interveners – the Conseil d’Etat and Court of Cassation Bar and the National Bar Council, two organisations representative of the professionals responsible for defending people in the domestic

delay, and by 31 December 2018 at the latest, and to keep the Committee of Ministers informed on a monthly basis about all relevant developments;   DECIDED to resume examination of this item, depending

Accordingly, the applicant had not had the benefit of a fair trial or the presumption of innocence because she had had no means of defending herself against the charge of malicious prosecution.

It held that the Regional Court had not dismissed her appeal for reasons depending on its discretion and therefore such an appeal could not have postponed the time limit for lodging a constitutional appeal