Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-176230
17 juillet 2017
17 juillet 2017
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or his right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177842
22 septembre 2017
22 septembre 2017
Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, or their right to freedom of assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178166
25 septembre 2017
25 septembre 2017
QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES All applications Has there been a violation of the applicants’ freedom to leave the territory of the respondent State, contrary to Article 2 of Protocol No. 4?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216858
17 mars 2022
17 mars 2022
with the standards developed in the Court’s case-law and on the basis of which life sentences could, in appropriate cases, be reduced, thus that the imposition of such a sentence was not in itself contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216863
17 mars 2022
17 mars 2022
developed in the Court’s case-law and on the basis of which life sentences could, in appropriate cases, be reduced, thus that the imposition of such a sentence on the applicant could not be said to be contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111610
23 mai 2012
23 mai 2012
On 20 June 2008 the Centru District Court found in favour of the applicant on the ground that contrary to the labour law, he had been dismissed while being on sick leave.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217996
24 mai 2022
24 mai 2022
In her application to the Court she complained that the refusal was unnecessary and discriminatory, contrary to Articles 8 and 14 of the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-220886
18 octobre 2022
18 octobre 2022
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in the light of the proceedings for the return of her child
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231173
26 janvier 2024
26 janvier 2024
They also held that they were not entitled to apply the Directive in question directly and to disregard the contrary domestic provision.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4581
6 novembre 2003
6 novembre 2003
he was being prosecuted for a particularly serious offence, the conditions necessary to authorise deprivation of freedom were presumed to exist, after a certain time, in the absence of proof to the contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216862
17 mars 2022
17 mars 2022
developed in the Court’s case-law and on the basis of which life sentences could, in appropriate cases, be reduced, thus that the imposition of such a sentence on the applicant could not be said to be contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-250457
5 mai 2026
5 mai 2026
refusal, the applicant, represented by his Czech lawyer, had submitted a complaint to the President of the Czech Republic complaining about his inability to provide services in Croatia, which he deemed contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177855
18 septembre 2017
18 septembre 2017
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206289
26 octobre 2020
26 octobre 2020
Did the applicant’s conviction of an administrative offence for “promotion of homosexuality among minors” violate her right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206549
9 novembre 2020
9 novembre 2020
Did the conditions of the applicant’s detention during the hearing before the Kyiv Pecherskyy District Court amount to inhuman or degrading treatment contrary to Article 3 of
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1014JUD003961118
14 octobre 2025
14 octobre 2025
The Court further found in that the general conditions of detention in this context had been contrary to Article 3 of the Convention (§§ 41-42).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD003131208
26 mars 2013
26 mars 2013
503/2003, was formalistic and contrary to the purpose of that Law.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198850
6 novembre 2019
6 novembre 2019
On 30 December 2013 the Blagoevgrad District Court found the applicant guilty of minor hooliganism contrary to Article 1 § 2 of the Decree on Combatting Minor Hooliganism (see paragraphs
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0117DEC002254193
17 janvier 1996
17 janvier 1996
to Section 18 (2) of the Morals (Policing) Act (Sittenpolizeigesetz), and (iii) offending public decency, contrary to the same provision, by insulting the policemen in the presence of other persons.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5004
13 février 2003
13 février 2003
referred to statements made by the second applicant with regard to the introduction of separate legal systems and the institution of a theocracy, if necessary by force, which the court found to be contrary
Source officiellePage 8 sur 1005