Until 1 July 2002 criminal-law matters were governed by the 1960   Code of Criminal Procedure of the RSFSR.

Audrey Glover of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.   4.

    The applicant complained under Article 3 of the Convention that he had been ill-treated by the police and that there had been no effective investigation into the matter.

The medical evidence, which consists of three forensic reports (see paragraphs   24, 30 and 34 above), does not elucidate the matters disputed.

  48939/99, § 91, ECHR 2004 ‑ ..., and, mutatis mutandis , Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom , no. 46477/99, § 54, ECHR 2002 ‑ II). 64.

    On 10 September 1999 a biology expert drew up a report saying that the blood-red dry matter taken from the scene of the incident was indeed human blood.

Audrey Glover, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, London.   4.     The application concerns the seizure and forfeiture of an aircraft belonging to the applicant company.

   On 12 January 1987, the DTI Inspectors notified the Secretary of State of matters which they thought should be brought to his attention.

The court noted that the investigator had failed to conduct a further inquiry and to clarify the circumstances of the matter.

Nor can Article 35 § 1 be interpreted in a manner which would require an applicant to inform the Court of his complaint before his position in connection with the matter has been finally settled at the

Aubrey- Fletcher, ex parte Thompson [1969] 1 WLR 872; ex parte Benjamin, loc. cit.).

adequate provision for securing high professional standards among health professionals and the protection of the lives of patients – which was not contested in the present case – it cannot accept that matters

    Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

Royaume-Uni (arrêt du 28 octobre 1998, Recueil 1998-VIII, p. 3159, § 115, et Paul et Audrey Edwards c. Royaume-Uni , n o 46477/99, CEDH 2002 ‑ II, § 54). 53.

    Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

Nor can Article 35 § 1 be interpreted in a manner that would require an applicant to bring a complaint before the Court before his position in connection with the matter has been finally settled at the

The applicant himself could not rule out the possibility that his son had in fact been murdered by a cell mate or a prison guard. 63.

  Sokorenko; the parties’ observations;   Having deliberated in private on 23 January 2025, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

    The above verdict was upheld by the Sumy Regional Court of Appeal on 15 March 2017 and by the Higher Specialised Court of Ukraine in Civil and Criminal Matters on 14 December 2017. 34.