THE ARSON ATTACK ON THE CLUB AND THE ENSUING INVESTIGATION 12 .     At around 5 a.m. on 8 May 2012 an arson attack was carried out on the club .

It was this group that organised the attack.

and testify against other applicants and other persons suspected in the attack.

Mr K.A. had used his firearm after all other attempts to halt the attack had proved futile. 22.

    On 11 June 2015 the applicant reported to the police that he had been subjected to two further attacks.

He described the attack, and cited the insult addressed to him by one of the assailants.

G. had informed him in 1993 that the applicant had given him the order to carry out the attack against the policemen.

    On the same day the applicant reported the attack to the police.

    Did the domestic authorities duly investigate and respond to the applicants’ allegation that the attack of 9 September 2016 had a discriminatory character?

  The Court then observed that the relevant State authorities had decided not to prosecute the alleged attackers and had not allowed Ms Janković’s attempts to prosecute privately.

The applicant claims that on 2 July 2014 his house was destroyed in an aerial attack. At the time of the attack, the applicant’s wife and mother-in-law had been inside the house or next to it.

In addition, the applicant’s representative asked that: any audiovisual material recording the attack be preserved and made available to her; the applicant’s casefile be updated with all documents and

However, the police never interviewed Michael Menson, who lapsed into a coma one week after the attack and died shortly afterwards.

The court established that it had been a premeditated attack which initially aimed a different person of Asiatic origin who had purportedly dealt drugs.

  Whether applicant was a victim Government estopped from denying that applicant was related to person killed in one of alleged attacks – in light of principles established in its case-law and particular

Moreover, she submitted that the competent domestic authorities had not paid due attention to the racial overtones implicit in the attack on her and had failed to prosecute the attackers for a hate crime

  Concerning the alleged attacks and incidents   42.

While there he described his attackers, giving details about their outfit and facial characteristics. He died on 4 April 1992.

violations of the applicant foundation’s rights under Articles 8 and 10 of the Convention in relation to the search – aiming to find links between the organisation that claimed responsibility for the bomb attack