Merits 1.     The parties’ submissions (a)     The applicant 19.

In June   2012 the commission submitted a report where it held that the applicant had not accepted A.V.’s separate complaint and had sent it back to the wrong address.

It includes design tools to help users create layouts for their blogs and, if they do not have their own web address, enables them to host their blogs on Blogger.com web addresses.

The Court heard addresses by Mr Gain for the Government, by Mr Weitzel for the Commission and by Mr Welsch for the applicant. 7.

    Merits 1.     The parties' submissions 23.

As to the merits, he asked the Court of Appeal to rule on the lawfulness of the administrative decision.

The court did not address the applicant's argument concerning the dismissal of the plaintiff from the university. Both parties appealed against this decision. 17.

As the Specialised Anti-Terrorism Squad had changed its address, the initial service of process, having been made at its old address, had to be repeated at its new one.

The Commission further notes that the Court of Appeal rejected the applicant's request to summon "Hugo", observing that his name and address were not known to the Dutch police and judicial authorities,

The State started to address the problem that arose due to the impossibility of honouring the banks’ obligations based on the old foreign currency by enacting a law in 1998 which precisely defined the

National authorities should take active steps to address the culture of secrecy that still prevails in many countries within the public sector.

The Court therefore decides to join this objection to the merits. B.     As to the merits of the application 1.

s allegations against the plaintiff], D. addresses the question of royalty payments by Audi AG to Porsche AG or other companies in which P. holds shares.' 3.

[Adresse 2] [Localité 1] Représenté par Me Patricia PIJOT de la SCP PIJOT POMPIER MERCEY, avocat au barreau de BEZIERS, avocat postulant assisté de Me Alice CALDUMBIDE, avocat au barreau de BEZIERS

Par courrier du 30 décembre 2025, une demande de pièces a été adressée aux parties en application de l’article R. 613-1-1 du code de justice administrative.

  Le 17 mars 1998, la Commission a adressé aux parties le texte de sa décision sur la recevabilité de la requête et les a invitées à lui soumettre les éléments ou observations complémentaires sur

    Merits 1. Whether there was an interference with the exercise of freedom of peaceful assembly 23.

  The Court heard addresses by Mr. Ferrari Bravo, Mr. Striani and Mr. Grasso for the Government, by Mr. Weitzel for the Commission and by Mr. Corigliano and Mr.

        As the Commission emphasised at paragraph 64 of its report, a Contracting State cannot claim to have discharged its obligations under Article 8 (art. 8) merely by