The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.

The applicant’s lawyer was present during that questioning. 3.

However, it had either been impossible or been omitted to pursue a sexual therapy with the applicant during his long detention in a psychiatric hospital.

Court of St   Petersburg, St   Petersburg City Court, Second Appellate Court More than 2 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 28 day(s)   failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during

  32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), as regards detention in a metal cage during court hearings; Idalov v.

    The applicant argued that he had been denied legal assistance during his time in police custody.

During the visit they met with the applicant who informed them of the circumstances of his arrest and detention from 5 to 7   March 2015.

The application further concerns the domestic authorities’ failure to inform the applicant of her basic rights during the investigation stage and to appoint a lawyer for her during the trial stage. 2.

During my clinical examination carried out on that day, the patient had restriction in motion due to pain especially during maximal flexion and extension of the lower back.

    The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.

  (a)     If yes, did the national authorities make reasonable effort to secure the presence of the witnesses during trials as requested by the applicant?

He had stayed there for twenty or twenty-two days during the summer of 2007, for fourteen days during the summer of 2008 and for sixteen days in December 2008.

During the meeting the applicant and his representative were divided by a glass partition, had to use the phone to talk and could not exchange documents; the phone conversations were listened to by the

  32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), concerning the use of metal cages during court hearings; Dirdizov v.

Two explosive devices and two detonators were found and seized during the search. 8.

The investigation, during which all the accused were questioned, lasted 5 years.

During transport, they had observed that the applicant’s trousers had come off and could not be pulled up because they had been damaged.

The applicant was arrested on suspicion of having participated in mass disorder and of having used violence against the police during the demonstration of 6 May 2012.

during pre-trial investigation shall not exceed two months.