In its judgment, the court was silent about the applicant’s request for a DNA test.

       However, the right not to incriminate oneself is primarily concerned with respecting the will of an accused person to remain silent.

But because the provisions of domestic law were silent about short-term visits when both spouses were serving their prison sentences, the Prison Department considered that short-term visits were not available

They went to Grozny in I.M.’s silvery VAZ-2109 vehicle with licence plate containing figures “904” [ sic ].

Her neighbours told her that they had seen a silvery UAZ-469 vehicle. The first applicant also found two spent cartridges in the yard. 13.

  282 ‑ A, and Sievert v. Germany , no. 29881/07, § 62, 19 July 2012). 45.

The intruders ordered the Musikhanov men to remain silent and not to move and checked their identity documents.

    The City Court decision was silent on the issue of the applicant's detention. 39 .

I recommend to these [people] to hide the shame of their thinking and remain silent. Lithuania is now free.

During the hearing, the applicant made use of his right to remain silent and only intervened during his closing statement.

According to the applicant, the examination was only superficial and he was forced by the police to keep silent about his ill ‑ treatment. 12.

He was informed by detective officer M. that he was suspected of having kidnapped J. and was instructed about his rights as a defendant, notably the right to remain silent and to consult a lawyer.

Do not stay silent! Do not surrender!’ Those calls are addressed to Crimean residents and incite them to commit unlawful actions.” 7 .

He opted to remain silent in response to questions on the material recovered from his house and garden.

She had claimed to have given him the red toy car on the occasion of his christening rather than to keep him silent, and had provided photographs to support her statements.

His lawyer remained silent. C. The court proceedings 1. In the Bülach District Court 20.

        Le requérant est représenté devant la Commission par Me Michele Gentiloni Silverj, avocat à Rome.

It was found that, despite the fact that the applicant had been informed at the beginning of his trial of his right to remain silent and that all his earlier statements could not be used as evidence against

by the reasons for his continued detention from 8 November: not disclosing names of witnesses was not a valid reason for detention and, requiring him to do so, was in breach of his right to remain silent