470, § 67; and Perna v. Italy [GC], no.   48898/99, §   29, ECHR 2003 ‑ V). 37.

request to call witnesses by explaining the importance of doing so and it must be necessary for the court to take evidence from the witnesses concerned in order to be able to establish the true facts (see Perna

However, it remains the Court’s task to ascertain whether the way in which evidence was taken was fair (see, for example, Perna v.

The Court is therefore empowered to give the final ruling on whether a “restriction” is reconcilable with freedom of expression as protected by Article 10 (see, among many other authorities, Perna v.

In addition, the Court is mindful of the fact that journalistic freedom also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (see, for example, Perna v.

The domestic courts thus lost sight of the article’s overall content (see Perna v. Italy [GC], no.   48898/99, §   47, ECHR 2003 ‑ V). 40.

Therefore, the request to call witnesses was sufficiently reasoned, relevant to the subject matter of the accusation and could arguably have led to the applicant’s acquittal (see, in this respect, Perna

The Court is therefore empowered to give the final ruling on whether a “restriction” is reconcilable with freedom of expression as protected by Article 10 (see, among many other authorities, Perna v.

Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, §§ 140-41, ECHR 2001-VII, and Perna v. Italy [GC], no.   48898/99, §§ 23-24, ECHR 2003-V).

0.0069 ha; 0.0063 ha; 0.01 ha; 0.0196 ha; 5.8702 ha; 6.0000 ha; 6.5901 ha; 6.8500 ha; 7.00 ha; 7.62 ha; 7.78 ha; 8.7300 ha (4 land plots of this size); 12,6798 ha; 19.2001 ha; 44.3808 ha); in Stepanivka Persha

Finland, cited above, § 141, and Perna v. Italy [GC], no.   48898/99, §§ 23-24, ECHR 2003 ‑ V). 31.

The visit took place in a special room with a Perspex partition separating the applicant from his visitors.

They must, in addition, support their request by explaining why it was important for the witness concerned to be heard and his evidence was necessary for the establishment of the truth (see Perna v.

proceedings on 28/02/2022 by the Ukrainian police. damage       20489/24 29/06/2022 Kostyantyn Volodymyrovych KARPENKO 1965       Private house (95.4 sq. m) and garage at 6 Persha

  38432/97, §§ 45-46, ECHR 2001 ‑ III; and Perna v.   Italy   [GC], no.   48898/99, § 39, ECHR 2003 ‑ V).

    The Grand Chamber recalls first of all that the scope of its jurisdiction in cases submitted to it is limited only by the Chamber's decision on admissibility (see Perna v.

as the relevance of the evidence which an accused seeks to adduce, and in particular whether it is appropriate to call witnesses in autonomous sense given to that term in the Convention system (see Perna

is therefore empowered to give the final ruling on whether a “restriction” is reconcilable with freedom of expression as protected by Article 10 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Perna

The personnel in police uniforms carried anti- riot gear, electrically charged clubs and perspex shields and wore helmets. The personnel in camouflage uniforms carried sub-machine-guns and pistols.