CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0105JUD002402303
5 janvier 2010
It also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. 5.
Page 77 sur 145
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1215JUD001648312
15 décembre 2016
The applicants and the Government each filed further written observations on the admissibility and merits of the case. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0527JUD000567116
27 mai 2021
The Court of Appeal also noted that the witnesses L.B. and S.S., for their part, had merely stated that the applicant had appeared to be under the influence of alcohol and had had difficulty walking when
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1206DEC001460005
6 décembre 2005
On 23 June 2004 Turkey’s Central Authority instructed the Sarıyer public prosecutor (“the public prosecutor”) to ascertain the child’s current address, apply to the Sarıyer Court for an order prohibiting
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1010JUD000478218
10 octobre 2019
ambiguity” ( Unklarheitenregel ) states that what is decisive in establishing the semantic content is how the statements in question are understood within their context by a significant part of the addressees
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0601JUD006281917
1 juin 2021
The CPS could merely apply the law. 22 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0214JUD003074912
14 février 2017
Merits 1. Argument before the Court (a) The Government 45.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0220JUD004386818
20 février 2024
On the merits, he asked the Federal Supreme Court, first, to set aside the lower court’s judgment in so far as that court had not examined the question whether the check of 5 February 2015 had been
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1203JUD000022618
3 décembre 2024
Merits 66. The applicants maintained their complaints. 67.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0325JUD004032416
25 mars 2021
charges pending against [the applicant] in France, the nature of the charges on which he was convicted in Romania, the severity of the sentence passed and the fact that, in the French proceedings, he has merely
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0322JUD003720197
22 mars 2001
The applicant and the Government each filed written observations on the admissibility and merits of the application. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0330JUD002092805
30 mars 2010
Merits 1. General principles 52.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0304JUD004272202
4 mars 2008
Merits 1. The parties’ submissions 48.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0710JUD001652805
10 juillet 2008
Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, the Court decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. THE FACTS I.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1115JUD001255603
15 novembre 2007
Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. THE FACTS I.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD005954510
26 novembre 2013
Merits 1. The parties’ submissions 33.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0711JUD005481000
11 juillet 2006
The applicant and the Government each filed observations on the merits. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0724JUD001860303
24 juillet 2008
As to the merits, the Government pointed out that the procedure at issue had been authorised by a judge who, together with the Court of Cassation, had also supervised it.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0503DEC006539713
3 mai 2016
Subsequent AWB meetings took place to address areas of disagreement, with adjournments for bilateral negotiations. This often led to agreement between the industrial parties.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0408JUD007150301
8 avril 2004
to submit written comments on the merits of the complaints that had been declared admissible (Rule 59 § 1 and Rule 71 §§ 1 and 2).