Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0401DEC006916901
1 avril 2004
1 avril 2004
repeat the verdict of the jury – i.e. the acquittal on the basis of the principle of in dubio pro reo – and the reasons given in the judgment, without making separate statements about the applicant's guilt
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0922DEC007233101
22 septembre 2005
22 septembre 2005
His subsequent liability was based on considerations of causality and did not imply any reproach of guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0117DEC002384294
17 janvier 1996
17 janvier 1996
He submits that a statement from a co-accused cannot be regarded as reliable and sufficient evidence of his guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-104413
10 mars 2011
10 mars 2011
The European Court found that appellate courts had full jurisdiction in the particular circumstances of these cases and were called upon “to make a full assessment of the question of the applicants’ guilt
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155297
20 mai 2015
20 mai 2015
It reasoned that the applicant had admitted his guilt and, as requested by the parties, the evidence had not been examined in trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177840
19 septembre 2017
19 septembre 2017
The captain’s guilt was based on the following: he had not kept the navigation system of the boat in good condition, notwithstanding his knowledge that this could have life-threatening consequences; he
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0419DEC003795715
19 avril 2016
19 avril 2016
Italy , 6 November 1980, § 100, Series A no. 39), proven guilt and the imposition of a penalty (see Grosskopf v. Germany , no.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155569
26 mai 2015
26 mai 2015
The district court held that the applicant’s guilt was confirmed, apart from his own testimonies, by other evidence collected by the investigation.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-112066
22 juin 2012
22 juin 2012
The applicant had fully acknowledged his guilt, repented, agreed that all evidence collected by the prosecution had been admissible and refused to answer further questions.
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253cd07bd3db21cbdd9210d
17 février 2015
17 février 2015
DOSSIER : 14/00005 No Minute : Demandeur à la question prioritaire : SARL SOCIETE IMMOBILIERE LA COMETE No SIRET : 442 66 0 2 05 129 Rue de l'Université 75007 PARIS Représentant : Me Elisa GUEILHERS
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-157329
28 août 2015
28 août 2015
Article 1070 § 2 excludes a presumption of culpability on the tortfeasor’s part, and requires the establishment of the judge’s guilt in a criminal judgment as an additional condition of State liability
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244036
2 juin 2025
2 juin 2025
Under Article 6 § 2 of the Convention the second applicant complains that the domestic courts attributed criminal guilt to him in relation to offences (corruption and unlawful interference in public procurement
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-166871
30 août 2016
30 août 2016
The applicant did not admit her guilt and submitted that A.S. had owed her a certain amount of money, which she was actually returning.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0612DEC004342598
12 juin 2001
12 juin 2001
The court further observed that the sentence was commensurate with the applicant’s degree of guilt and with the seriousness of the offence.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1114DEC002214720
14 novembre 2024
14 novembre 2024
re-examination, the domestic court’s task is to consider the outcome of the domestic proceedings and to weigh the alleged new evidence, so as to provide, if necessary, a new judgment on the person’s guilt
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0326DEC005729817
26 mars 2024
26 mars 2024
Thus, those proceedings were terminated without assessing any elements of the applicant’s guilt or innocence.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512DEC001489904
12 mai 2005
12 mai 2005
In particular, he complains that: (a) the findings of his guilt were based on the testimony by Mr P. who was neither a defendant nor a witness in his trial and whom he could not have examined
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0320JUD003172596
20 mars 2001
20 mars 2001
The Government offers to pay, on an ex gratia basis, 140,000 Netherlands guilders to Messrs Ercan and Salih Köksal with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the application to the European Court
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1121DEC004338405
21 novembre 2006
21 novembre 2006
They are designed to recover the proceeds of crime, rather than to establish, in the context of criminal proceedings, guilt of specific offences.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0615DEC004348698
15 juin 1999
15 juin 1999
failure to obey the orders of an officer a criminal offence, was compatible with Article 24 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right not to make self-incriminating statements and not to confess guilt
Source officiellePage 77 sur 292