CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-109490
2 janvier 2012
V.K. also failed to apprise the applicant of his constitutional right not to testify against himself, only questioning him generally concerning various transactions between his farm, K., and D.
Page 77 sur 3166
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0320DEC001650523
20 mars 2025
Croatia ([GC], no. 40160/12, §§ 76-99, 5 April 2018). 9.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0913JUD003069415
13 septembre 2022
On 24 April 2015 the magistrate of the 7th Istanbul Magistrate’s Court asked the second applicant to submit to him the applications for release submitted on 20 April 2015, arguing that he
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0215DEC004255198
15 février 2000
The City Court postponed the session until 1 April 1996.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0107JUD004000904
7 janvier 2010
On 9 and 16 April 2003 the applicants lodged two objections for bias, which were rejected on 14 and 22 April 2003. 83.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0403JUD004413508
3 avril 2018
’s office beginning from 21 April 2008.
ECLI:CEDH:001-121048
17 mai 2013
The execution of the judgment was to take place on 5 April 2008.
ECLI:CEDH:001-201315
20 janvier 2020
These findings were upheld by the Poltava Regional Court of Appeal on 20 April 2017 and by the final decision of Supreme Court of Ukraine on 18 April 2018. Application no 26039/18, Romanyuk v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-110366
14 février 2012
As to his detention in the prison he was transferred there to serve his sentence on 20 April 2007.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55960
26 juin 2001
margin-left:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution ResDH(2001)78 Concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 27 April
ECLI:CEDH:001-55898
2 octobre 2000
s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution ResDH(2000)130 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 5 April
ECLI:CEDH:001-56073
6 mars 2002
{ margin-top:0pt; margin-left:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution ResDH(2002)28 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 12 April
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6875
25 avril 2000
In April 1993 he was charged by the Czech authorities and subsequently placed in detention on remand.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49685
15 décembre 1995
before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention; Whereas in his application, declared admissible by the Commission on 1 April
ECLI:CEDH:002-7416
5 février 2013
The final domestic ruling in respect of his first request for such a permit was sent to him on 24 April 2012 and the regional-court judgment in respect of his second request on 5 April 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527DEC005411009
27 mai 2014
On 8 April 2014 the Court received a friendly settlement proposal from the Government, which after being subsequently rectified on 26 April 2014, reads as follows: “With due regard
ECLI:CEDH:001-196299
6 septembre 2019
In his civil action of 22 April 2005 he sought HRK 40,000.
ECLI:CEDH:001-165049
22 juin 2016
Poland (no. 20071/07, §§ 105-117, 17 April 2012) and Horych v. Poland (no. 13621/08, §§ 44-56, 17 April 2012).
ECLI:CEDH:001-209274
19 mars 2021
In April 2015 the applicant was eventually released on bail. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
ECLI:CEDH:001-188940
4 décembre 2018
On 24 April 2015 the Vanino District Court of the Khabarovsk Region discontinued the criminal investigation against V.